< User talk:Jvvg‎ | AF

You shouldn't make fun of a user. It's not right.
Dpinto04 (talk | contribs) 22:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

What was wrong with the Sonic theme?

I know there's a good amount of Sonic AF articles written by someone (Not mentioning any names), but why change it to fish? That seems so random....
Pianogirl84 (talk | contribs) 00:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

It was just the first thing that popped into my head. Also, I don't care if someone defishes it, I just don't want anyone to resonic it.
Popular GIF.gif Mitopolis (Talk | Contributions | Edits | Scratch account) 01:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Rules

I don't think the "fish" version broke any rules. I got the main idea as: "Kaj is a something disgused as a cat who wanted to get passed the ST."
Popular GIF.gif Mitopolis (Talk | Contributions | Edits | Scratch account) 17:06, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Make this More Constructive

I think that this page should be rewritten so that Kaj is not being made fun of, and all the Sonic jokes are removed. --
Chibi-Matoran (talk | contribs) 16:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

But it's the best we got!!!
PPL Icon.gif ♥PrincessPandaLover Talk | Contributions | Scratch Account 21:37, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
I will add better jokes.--
Chibi-Matoran (talk | contribs) 22:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Because of Jvvg's decision, I will remove all references to Shadow the Hedgehog and make the article nicer to Kaj.
Chibi-Matoran (talk | contribs) 02:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
You can leave some sonic stuff in - the jokes just need to be updated.
Helloandgoodbye9 (talk | contribs) 23:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

New Rule

From what I read, only some sonic content can be removed. A link to an older page is fine, as it shows people the old one but still allows for new jokes.
Helloandgoodbye9 (talk | contribs) 17:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't see the rule that way. The editor was linking to an older version of the page, which contains old jokes. I wasn't removing an old Sonic joke; I was removing a newly added edit. What does Jvvg think?
Chibi-Matoran (talk | contribs) 22:24, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Thats a good question - Ill add Jvvg. Anyways, I reverted it back to yours, as I think that it is to minor. Sorry about that.
Helloandgoodbye9 (talk | contribs) 22:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── My exact words were (emphasis mine) to "please try to use original ideas. This means trying to minimize repeating themes between articles...in order to cycle the humor." I specifically said minimize repeating themes and cycle the humor. I did not say get rid of all Sonic (or any theme, for that matter). I want to see original creativity and humor, but that just means putting new ideas in the pages if you have them. This doesn't obligate anybody to remove anything, and I would also be fine with adding to any pages with Sonic without removing the Sonic content, since that is still adding new humor.

However, that aside, the real issue here is the animosity directed at Sonic content and the attitude people are taking towards removing it. People are using my words to try to justify removing all Sonic content, and this is happening to the point where it seems it is a personal vendetta to remove it and not actually an attempt to keep the AF pages funny. Removing the Sonic content simply for the sake of removing it is essentially a personal conflict, and personal conflicts have no place on the Wiki. Following this, my recommendation is what it was before: I encourage adding new content to the AF pages, and this may mean removing existing content from those pages. I will also specifically emphasize that you probably shouldn't remove anything that wasn't yet there on the most recent April First (check the revision history). If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 02:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

One other thing: both of you seem to be suspicious of each others' intentions. In this case, it looks like both of you are trying to help and are just disagreeing over the rules, so please remember to assume good faith in Wiki discussions.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 02:33, 3 July 2016 (UTC)