Why don't more pages have this?

Me, to the rescue, I guess. :P
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 22:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Define "low","moderate","high"

I have my own definitions in mind, but I'm curious to see what others think.
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 22:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

By the way, my definitions are:

  • Topics
    • Low: <1000
    • Moderate: 1000-3000
    • High: >3000 --This works because there is a gap between the highest moderate and the lowest high.
  • Replies
    • Low: <10000
    • Moderate: 10000-25000
    • High: >25000

Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 13:41, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Or maybe replies should be measured per topic?
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 20:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
That would indicate the average lifetimes of each topic in the forum, not the overall activity in the forum, so I would rather go with the total number of replies.
But anyway, to your original question, I would agree with what you laid out. That's about where I think as well.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 23:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Do we need a specific number? Can't we just consider it common sense and judgement?
Turkey3 (talk | contribs) 18:39, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


Maybe there could be something so there could be a picture and the picture could be a picture of the forum.
Ziggy741 (talk | contribs) 23:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I'll try to add it. Admins can undo the edit if they want.
Ziggy741 (talk | contribs) 17:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)