Page Deletion

 Unresolved (see all...)

I don't think watermarks deserve their own page, since it is unimportant and it is part of user-generated content on Scratch. Requesting this page to be deleted.
OurPrincess (talk | contribs) 11:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

This doesn't break S:NOSP though, since many Scratchers use it, not just one. A quote directly from it:
The exceptions to this rule are:
-snip-
Trends that are notably popular; the trends must be practiced by many Scratchers.

-S:NOSP

VFDan.png VFDan  Talk  Contribs  On Scratch  17:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

This page is too simple and short. I agree that watermarks are important, however, if there was more information than this would've been a better article.
J_Coder26 (talk | contribs) 07:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)J_Coder26

I think it should be moved to a different article. This is more of a section than an article.
ContourLines Logo.png ContourLines Talk | Contributions | Directory 09:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
I just think it could maybe be expanded more, but it definently deserves an article. Like for example, a Scratcher says to a New Scratcher, "Do you put watermarks on your projects?" and the New Scratcher has no idea what it is. They'd search this Wiki for the term, and see this page, explaining what it is. Or they could just ask the Scratcher, I guess. I don't know where I'm going with this, but I do think the page should stay.
Dominic305.png Dominic305  Talk  Contribs (1,774)  Scratch  Directory 
11:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
I agree with Dominic305. This article could be very useful to people that don't know what a watermark is and look it up on the Scratch Wiki. I think it should stay.
Illusion705's User Logo1.png   Illusion705 talk | contribs  20:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
-snip-

– Dominic305, this page

I didn't discover the Wiki until like June of this year... I joined September last year... I don't think that a New Scratcher will discover the Wiki when, y'know, new scratcher time. Lovecodeabc Links: talk (new topic) | contribs (658) | directory 13:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

I think this page could be useful for somebody who doesn't know what a watermark is. I think it should stay. User:Neha41/Signature 15:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────I also think this page should stay but it does need to be extended quite a bit. Lovecodeabc, some new scratchers might know about the wiki from siblings, or scratchers they are following.
Filmlover12 (talk | contribs) 09:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Maybe we can make a different section in some other page, and write about it in there. There aren't many Scratchers who actually use a watermark, and it is pretty self-explanatory.

SiggyForPraCoco.pngPraCocoTalkContributions 07:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


Madcoding1 (talk | contribs) 16:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)I think this topic should stay because I think it is useful to learn what it is. I will expand it a little.
-unsigned comment by Madcoding1 (talk | contribs)
Hi folks, I fixed the indenting in this discussion enough to make it easily readable. If you are confused about indenting, then please check out Help:Welcome/4. :)
As for the article, I think that the information definitely has a place on the wiki, though I an indifferent as to whether it has its own page or is a section in another page. If the latter option is chosen, it would still be easily searchable as we could just make a redirect to that section. :)
Bigpuppy Logo.png bigpuppy talk ▪︎ contribs 18:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Couldn't this be merged somewhere else? The information here is definitely useful enough to be on the wiki, but as it's own article? It should just be a redirect.
Dhuls's Wiki Icon.png Dhuls (Talk|473 Contributions|Scratch) 03:45, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
I agree with dhuls, this should be merged as a section in a different article, perphaps Project Trends, and have this page redirect to it.
TheTrillion's Profile Picture.png  TheTrillion • Talk • 2,191 contributions • Scratch  14:06, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
I also agree with dhuls and TheTrillion. It would make sense for this to be merged with Project Trends.
Jackson49 (talk | contribs) 16:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Wow, that's a long topic than I actually expected. Anyways, to put my comments: while I also agree on the principle that we can merge this article into Project Trends (as it's primarily relevant to projects), I think it would be a loose connection between the topics, as watermarks are also used (as far as I've seen) outside of projects in Scratch; for example I've seen some examples of watermarks on forum banners, shops, and studio thumbnails before, even though their scope and spread is fairly limited. However, currently the page itself is lacking lots of features that is expected on a proper, separated article: citations, pictures, content, and so on. After some edits, I believe that the article may show similar resemblance Evil Kumquat per content formatting, and would be no need to merge, even though a mention would be helpful for the readers.
Ahmetlii logo.gif ahmetlii  Talk  Contributions  Directory 
18:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Maybe we put this into Project Trends and Forum Trends?
A drawing of lavender.jpg Petaldancer66 (talk | contribs) 19:56, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Chiming in to say that I don't think this deserves its own article, but I don't agree that it should have gone into Project Trends either. This isn't really a trend - it's just a component of a project that some people use. If I had to pick, I'd say to merge it into Project Types and redirect this to that section.
Kenny2scratch logo.jpg kenny2scratch  Talk  Contribs  Directory 
03:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
I feel like there would need to be more information for this to be worthy of an article. Yeah, I'm gonna have to say Watermarks doesn't deserve its own article. Maybe, like Kenny2Scratch said, merge it into Project Types.
78ch3ProfilePic.png78ch3: My Talk | Contribs | Main 06:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

References section

Yes Resolved (since 04:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC))

Should I add a "References" section? There is one missing
ILikeProggraming123 (talk | contribs) 18:28, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

I would say yes, but there's no references
Jackson49 (talk | contribs) 15:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
As per Jackson49--once the page has references, a section for them should definitely be added. :)
Bigpuppy Logo.png bigpuppy talk ▪︎ contribs 04:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.