We can't spread this around. It could turn Scratch into a flashy advertising place, and also ruin its uniqueness. This could be pretty bad, especially if they didn't fix it quickly.

It's not notable either, and posting it on the wiki could make it seem semi-official and that we support it.
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 17:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

What's wrong with letting people customize their project thumbnails? They already can with user avatars and studio icons. The fact that it specifically says "A user has made a hack..." makes it pretty clear that it's not official. There are also plenty of other things like this on the Wiki, as you can see in the Hidden Features article.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 17:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's so bad. If the Scratch Team thought it was terrible they'd of probably said it was not allowed or have removed it by now. Anyway, can we put the bit back and leave it till we've finished or atleast only comment it out? I wouldn't want it being lost forever under a pile of other changes and people forgetting to put it back if we do decide that.
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 17:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Well, a user made BYOB, but we document it. How does this compare to BYOB? Also, it will still look a lot like we are promoting it.
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 00:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.