Talk:Scratch Team Blog

How should we do it?

Basically the whole post (like now) or just a summary? Something in-between?
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 17:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

In my opinion, it looks fine as it is... though to be honest, the article seems a bit unnecessary. ^^
Jonathanpb (talk | contribs) 03:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Maybe not as it is right now, but there should be something about it on the wiki.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 11:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Should this be all posts

Basically the whole article is posts copied from the blog. You could just have link to it. Should this be about what the blog is instead of what is in it.
Bsteward (talk | contribs) 23:14, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

XD when I saw the title I thought you were asking if we should include all the posts.

It might be better that way. :S
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 02:46, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

In my opinion, the way this article is designed is not very effective. Although it gives the reader the latest blog posts, that is not article. The Scratch Wiki articles are to inform, not copy large amounts of information that can easily be found otherwise. Including a section for notable posts might be acceptable, but apart from that, the whole copying of the blog posts should be removed.
Lucario621 (talk | contribs) 23:00, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

I didn't know Scatch had a blog?
JJROCKER (talk | contribs) 23:00, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

They sure do! :) Usually pretty cool stuff they post, when they do post.
Lucario621 (talk | contribs) 23:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

May I have a link? Thanks :D
JJROCKER (talk | contribs) 23:06, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Link. This link should probably be in the article...
Lucario621 (talk | contribs) 23:43, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I wonder if they have a page for the 2,000,000th project.
JJROCKER (talk | contribs) 00:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

I totally agree with what Lucario621 said.
Bsteward (talk | contribs) 00:00, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

I made a possible new version with out the posts in my sandbox. It's kind of short. Feel free to add any content to the article in my sandbox. If you think I should change this article to the one in my sandbox tell me. Please leave comments about it below.
Bsteward (talk | contribs) 02:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

So do that, and mark it as a stub. :)
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 18:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Category

Should this article be categorized under Category:Scratch Culture as it currently is? Or should it be categorized under Category:Scratch Website? Or both, or even a different category? What do you guys think?
Lucario621 (talk | contribs) 02:30, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Maybe both. It does seem to go with both of them.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 08:38, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure if it really fits in Scratch Culture, as it's just a blog that the Scratch Team runs - not any kind of phenomenon or user-created fad or idea.
Lucario621 (talk | contribs) 22:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)