Songs we're making and creating 3
The reason why I removed this section was not because it was sonic. In fact, I didn't even realize it was Sonic when I removed it. The reason why I removed was because it had no information, and I felt that a blank section (except the template) was unnecessary.
Anyway, my intention was definitely not to start a flame war between Hockey and PPL about Sonic. I think both of you need to review S:BRD, because you both broke that rule. Please, no more reverts! We don't want an edit war here! If you think that a change was questionable, then please, calmly discuss it here first.
I don't think that we should remove all sonic content from the wiki, but I do think that there's a point at which it becomes overkill. For example, on Scratch Meme, whilst it's okay for Sonic to be mentioned there, I think that mentioning specific Sonic memes is unnecessary.
So can we please just discuss this below? I hope jvvg doesn't have to get involved in this, because I'm sure he has a lot on his hands already.
Hamish752 (talk | contribs) 22:06, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- If you aren't aware, a while ago she has Sonicized basically every page in the AF Wiki. It was protested and frowned upon, and heavily reverted. I really don't want a repeat of her behavior.
TheHockeyist (talk | contribs) 00:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- It's a true album and needs a section on the article. I chose the alternate title and was approved, I didn't mean to "Sonicize" the article. By the way, the edit summary of my recent revert had an error in it (I accidentally submitted the edit). It was meant to be, "IT'S A TRUE ALBUM. TO MAKE YOU HAPPY, I COMMENTED OUT THE SONIC-RELATED STUFF".
♥PrincessPandaLover Talk | Contributions | Scratch Account 00:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm aware of what happened on the AF wiki, but that's a different situation. Here, the album name directly relates to this article, which is why I think it should stay. Whether or not we should remove it because it has no content is a different argument. But since here, it's relevant and not overkill, I don't see any reason to remove it.
- I suppose that this will do for now. TheHockeyist (talk | contribs) 02:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- @all: An edit war is never a good thing. It is nice that we seem to have reached the agreement of keeping the current version, but please remember, it's better to discuss earlier and not start a war. Despite our struggles, we are all people, and we can find a solution to the problem.
- For now, I have protected the page until tempers have completely simmered out.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 19:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- I suppose that this will do for now.
Btw, my edit was made like a billion years ago! ♥PrincessPandaLover Talk | Contributions | Scratch Account 01:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter. TheHockeyist (talk | contribs) 02:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
