Garnet, if you believe this release does not exist, please tell me what the link in the infobox goes to.

Also, it is the standard to use common names for things like Semicolon Glitch - while no official name is given, the common name is Scratch 0.6. "Pre-1.0" appears to be a term made up by you.
Naleksuh.jpg Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 00:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

First, please do not call me garnet, because it's memory triggering.

Second, this (scroll) I didn't necessarily make it up myself, and many users call what you call "Scratch 0.6" "Pre-1.0" or a similar variant of that.
Garnet.gif garnetluvcookie  talk  contribs  directory  00:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Also, it's the final beta before 1.0, it's technically correct to call it Pre-1.0.
Garnet.gif garnetluvcookie  talk  contribs  directory  00:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I see. Well, it is still consistent to call it 0.6 with the other titles. In addition, all revisions from 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, are all technically pre-1.0. So I do not think that makes any local sense and the page is best where it is now.
Naleksuh.jpg Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 01:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I disagree. To me, Scratch 0.6 just sounds out of place. When voting (completely unrelated but ok), it's either on a scale of 1-5, or 1-10. In my life, I have never seen someone use a scale of 0-6 (many people may use it, I don't know since I'm younger than you think)
Garnet.gif garnetluvcookie  talk  contribs  directory  01:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
???? This has nothing to do with voting. 0.6 is a version number, same as 1.4 or 3.0. I have never seen anyone use a scale from 1-4. But that doesn't stop anyone from saying Scratch 1.4. The same thing applies to Scratch 0.6. And it should be called 0.6 and not Pre-1.0 as that is the version name.
VFDan.png VFDan  Talk  Contribs  On Scratch  01:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
It must be Scratch 0.6 because of common naming.
Ahmetlii logo.gif ahmetlii  Talk  Contributions  Directory 
06:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
It sounds out of place to me. Plus, it resembles 1.x the most editor-wise, so I see Pre-1.0 or a variant of that fitting.
Garnet.gif garnetluvcookie  talk  contribs  directory  11:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── I don't think it should be called Pre 1.0 because it should stay consistent with the other titles, but I don't see a problem with having a redirect and "also known as." However, where does the .6 come from? Do a lot of people call it that? If the .6 is just an arbitrary number, maybe Scratch 0.x would be better.
Groko13 Logo.png Groko13 / talk / contribs 19:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Because this is the build after 0.5.
Naleksuh.jpg Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 19:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Okay, then I think it should stay Scratch 0.6. Although, it might be worthwhile to merge all the pre-1.0 pages because they're pretty short, but I haven't checked what links to them.
Groko13 Logo.png Groko13 / talk / contribs 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Yeah I don't think it is a good idea to merge them. For one, there are many inbounds links and use cases just like there are for the post releases, which probably shouldn't go to sections. Also, the solution for the page being short is not to make it even shorter by merging, but to expand it, there is lots of content to add.
Naleksuh.jpg Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 20:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
i never said i agreed that the title should be scratch 0.6, why are you discussing redirects to here when we haven't even decided a title?
Garnet.gif garnetluvcookie  talk  contribs  directory  20:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
I'm just saying that if we keep the title as Scratch 0.6 (which is my current opinion), I think that Pre 1.0 and/or other similar titles could redirect to this page.
Groko13 Logo.png Groko13 / talk / contribs 21:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Ok. Since it's obvious I'm fighting a losing battle, I give up. Go delete the redirects and do your happy dance.
Garnet.gif garnetluvcookie  talk  contribs  directory  21:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Just to drop in my two cents, I think the current title should stay for uniformity. I also like the idea of merging the pre-1.0 pages, if we can fix all the redirects.
Dominic305.png Dominic305  Talk  Contribs (1,762)  Scratch  Directory 
14:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)