(Redirected from Talk:Scratch 0.6)
Garnet, if you believe this release does not exist, please tell me what the link in the infobox goes to.
Also, it is the standard to use common names for things like Semicolon Glitch - while no official name is given, the common name is Scratch 0.6. "Pre-1.0" appears to be a term made up by you. 
Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 00:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- First, please do not call me garnet, because it's memory triggering.
Second, this (scroll) I didn't necessarily make it up myself, and many users call what you call "Scratch 0.6" "Pre-1.0" or a similar variant of that. 
garnetluvcookie (talk | contribs) 00:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Also, it's the final beta before 1.0, it's technically correct to call it Pre-1.0. garnetluvcookie (talk | contribs) 00:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I see. Well, it is still consistent to call it 0.6 with the other titles. In addition, all revisions from 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, are all technically pre-1.0. So I do not think that makes any local sense and the page is best where it is now.
Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 01:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree. To me, Scratch 0.6 just sounds out of place. When voting (completely unrelated but ok), it's either on a scale of 1-5, or 1-10. In my life, I have never seen someone use a scale of 0-6 (many people may use it, I don't know since I'm younger than you think) garnetluvcookie (talk | contribs) 01:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- ???? This has nothing to do with voting. 0.6 is a version number, same as 1.4 or 3.0. I have never seen anyone use a scale from 1-4. But that doesn't stop anyone from saying Scratch 1.4. The same thing applies to Scratch 0.6. And it should be called 0.6 and not Pre-1.0 as that is the version name.
Luvexina Talk Contribs On Scratch 01:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- It must be Scratch 0.6 because of common naming.
ahmetlii Talk Contributions Directory 06:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- It sounds out of place to me. Plus, it resembles 1.x the most editor-wise, so I see Pre-1.0 or a variant of that fitting. garnetluvcookie (talk | contribs) 11:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- It sounds out of place to me. Plus, it resembles 1.x the most editor-wise, so I see Pre-1.0 or a variant of that fitting.
- It must be Scratch 0.6 because of common naming.
- ???? This has nothing to do with voting. 0.6 is a version number, same as 1.4 or 3.0. I have never seen anyone use a scale from 1-4. But that doesn't stop anyone from saying Scratch 1.4. The same thing applies to Scratch 0.6. And it should be called 0.6 and not Pre-1.0 as that is the version name.
- I disagree. To me, Scratch 0.6 just sounds out of place. When voting (completely unrelated but ok), it's either on a scale of 1-5, or 1-10. In my life, I have never seen someone use a scale of 0-6 (many people may use it, I don't know since I'm younger than you think)
- I see. Well, it is still consistent to call it 0.6 with the other titles. In addition, all revisions from 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, are all technically pre-1.0. So I do not think that makes any local sense and the page is best where it is now.
- Also, it's the final beta before 1.0, it's technically correct to call it Pre-1.0.
I don't think it should be called Pre 1.0 because it should stay consistent with the other titles, but I don't see a problem with having a redirect and "also known as." However, where does the .6 come from? Do a lot of people call it that? If the .6 is just an arbitrary number, maybe Scratch 0.x would be better. 
Groko13 / talk / contribs 19:07, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Because this is the build after 0.5. Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 19:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, then I think it should stay Scratch 0.6. Although, it might be worthwhile to merge all the pre-1.0 pages because they're pretty short, but I haven't checked what links to them. Groko13 / talk / contribs 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah I don't think it is a good idea to merge them. For one, there are many inbounds links and use cases just like there are for the post releases, which probably shouldn't go to sections. Also, the solution for the page being short is not to make it even shorter by merging, but to expand it, there is lots of content to add. Naleksuh (talk | contribs) 20:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- i never said i agreed that the title should be scratch 0.6, why are you discussing redirects to here when we haven't even decided a title? garnetluvcookie (talk | contribs) 20:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- i never said i agreed that the title should be scratch 0.6, why are you discussing redirects to here when we haven't even decided a title?
- Yeah I don't think it is a good idea to merge them. For one, there are many inbounds links and use cases just like there are for the post releases, which probably shouldn't go to sections. Also, the solution for the page being short is not to make it even shorter by merging, but to expand it, there is lots of content to add.
- Okay, then I think it should stay Scratch 0.6. Although, it might be worthwhile to merge all the pre-1.0 pages because they're pretty short, but I haven't checked what links to them.
- Because this is the build after 0.5.
Ok. Since it's obvious I'm fighting a losing battle, I give up. Go delete the redirects and do your happy dance. garnetluvcookie (talk | contribs) 21:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Just to drop in my two cents, I think the current title should stay for uniformity. I also like the idea of merging the pre-1.0 pages, if we can fix all the redirects.
Dominic305 Talk Contribs (1,791) Scratch Directory 14:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
