I am recreating this page because the page which it was moved to is for discussion of another article.

The header states that this page may be deleted. I don't want that, because this article explain what a programming language is, which is relevant to Scratch, a programming language. I will do my best to improve the article.--
Chibi-Matoran (talk | contribs) 21:02, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Scratch is a programming language, but this article does not directly relate to Scratch. This could go on any other wiki.
Abstract- (talk | contribs) 01:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
I am working on this page to make it relevant. We need to educate Scratchers on what a programming language actually is, and many aspects actually relate to Scratch.
Chibi-Matoran (talk | contribs) 03:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
I think that although this page is not related to Scratch, it would be very useful especially to Scratchers who want to switch from Scratch to a more advanced language. I will shortly be editing it to relate Scratch blocks to another language.
MountainMaker (talk | contribs) 21:51, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
@Abstract-: How does it not relate to Scratch? This article discusses various features of Scratch and what they mean.
Now, I do see the article is half Scratch related and half programming related. That alone should mean its a keep. Now, as for improving it or making it more Scratch relevant, that's up to everyone to chip in. :)
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 06:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I was worried that this article would be deleted. I added information about programming language implementation on both this article and Programming Language_(Project_Type). Which article more appropriate?
Chibi-Matoran (talk | contribs) 21:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Both articles seem like they should have this information. In Programming Language_(Project_Type), implementation is discussed from an implementer's point of view. In Programming Language, implementation is discussed from an outsider's point of view, and brings in new information. They both offer their own benefits for what they're trying to achieve. It feels like removing one or the other will actually be un-helpful.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 04:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

; in JavaScript

Should we remove the ; everywhere in JS where the interpreter knows about the end of a statement already? For example, if (bool) {something;} else {something;} could be if (bool) {something} else {something}.
Jokebookservice1 (talk | contribs) 11:04, 29 January 2017 (UTC)