Citation for GDPR accounts not being test accounts

There is a thread on the forums asking about GDPR accounts, and one user hypothesized that GDPR accounts were created as test accounts, then another user replied (referencing this article) that they weren't test accounts but users who wanted their data wiped under the GDPR, to which the user responded saying that the claim was flagged as "citation needed." To my knowledge we don't have any official Scratch Team statement about GDPR accounts, but in my opinion this seems obvious enough that it doesn't need a citation. What are everyone's thoughts on this?
jvvg (talk | contribs) 01:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Should We Add as Many GDPR Accounts as we Can?

I saw the new 'Known GDPR Accounts' section on this page and decided to find some more GDPR accounts. I was able to find gdpr0000007 and gdpr0000008, but I noticed the text 'There is likely thousands of more accounts that have yet to be discovered', and thought that if we added EVERY GDPR account the list would be very, very, very long. So... should we keep it restricted to the most known GDPRs, or add as many until the list gets too long?
-The_EpicXD (talk | contribs) 02:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

I think the list should be replaced with a list of example GPDR accounts that have noteworthy features (for example, gdpr0000001, the one that goes higher than the character limit, and one with a profile picture).
Jammum Icon.png Jammum (💬 Talk - ✍️ Contribs - 🐱 Scratch) 17:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
The list is already a list of examples, maybe it could be most-known GDPR accounts?
-The_EpicXD (talk | contribs) 20:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't think there's any value in trying to list all of the GDPR accounts, since we will probably never actually know the full list and there isn't really any documentation value in them. I agree with jammum that we should only list notable ones.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 21:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.