Would the project "Echolocation Creation" be involved in any controversy? People were mad because the idea was copied from a previous featured project.
Kritav (talk | contribs) 21:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Should We Add Current Featured Projects?
^^
NYCDOT [ Talk Page | Contributions | Directory ] 21:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- People have suggested this before, and the argument against it is always that it takes too much effort to update it every day. No.
kenny2scratch Talk Contribs Directory 08:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
#Controversial Featured Projects
 Resolved (since 17:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC))
|
|---|
I feel like this section should be removed because individual projects are not notable. As well, surely a Scratcher who was humiliated for having copied a project wouldn't want themself or others to be reminded of that particular incident, and nobody would want insensitive comments by their inexperienced, younger selves to be referenced in a Wiki article. There could instead be a section named "Controversy" listing the most common criticisms of featured projects in general
Mlcreater (talk | contribs) 20:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- I agree. It’s not really notable and almost seems like naming and shaming. It arguably breaks the Community Guidelines.
Jackson49 (talk | contribs) 05:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Agree as well. As well as possible naming and shaming, many of those controversies are likely to have fallen into obscurity (the articles about trends and major Scratch controversies require significant impact to be added to the wiki).
Jammum (💬 Talk - ✍️ Contribs) 10:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Agree as well. As well as possible naming and shaming, many of those controversies are likely to have fallen into obscurity (the articles about trends and major Scratch controversies require significant impact to be added to the wiki).
This section has been removed, so this is a Done.
Gdxfor (talk | contribs) 17:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
