Why was the stub marking added to this article?
It looks complete to me... it doesn't seem to be missing any sections and such. :/ 
Jonathanpb (talk | contribs) 05:04, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- To me it seems very short and possibly missing some parts. Dazman (talk | contribs) 05:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- If you think it's missing some parts, add those parts in. :P
- But we don't call articles stubs just because they're short (read the template ;)) - but yeah, if it's just a few sentences, you should mark it as a stub anyway. :P Jonathanpb (talk | contribs) 06:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
