How should I/we improve this page?
 Resolved (since 12:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC))
|
|---|
I know that I need to add more projects to the list, but other than that, how should I improve this?
NitroCipher (talk | contribs | edits | account) 18:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- This user hasn't been active for a while now, so I'm going to mark this as resolved. In case you still want an answer, the descriptions of Interpretation, Dynamic Recompilation, and Static Recompilation is a little lackluster, and I also think a couple of examples of each kind of emulation would be good. Information about emulation isn't exactly widespread on the internet, but as a starting point, I would suggest reading Dolphin Emulator's blog posts as they're excellent articles to read and give a basic outline of how emulation works under the hood.
Gdxfor (talk | contribs) 12:15, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
6 different links to Scratch
| Resolved (since 07:41, 10 November 2020 (UTC))
|
|---|
I do not think there should be 6 links to "Scratch" in the "Emulators on Scratch" section of this article because S:EC#Wikilinks says,
| “ | Multiple wiki links are when a page links to another page two or more times. This is generally disallowed… | ” |
Mlcreater (talk | contribs) 00:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Done
Jammum (💬 Talk - ✍️ Contribs) 07:41, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Remove the "Emulators on Scratch" section
| Resolved (since 19:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC))
|
|---|
It seems like advertising. Thoughts?
TheTrillion • Talk • 2,624 contributions • Scratch 00:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- I agree that it seems like advertising, although I don't think that was the intention. You could argue that the projects are like examples, and are notable enough for the article.
Jackson49 (talk | contribs) 02:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- If it's supposed to be examples, it should just be a list, not full subsections for each project.
Dhuls (Talk|927 Contributions|Scratch) 23:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with dhuls. Including examples is acceptable and explicitly allowed in S:NOSP, but that also says "[examples] should only be mentioned in the context of the article. The article should not be or look like an article about that specific project."
jvvg (talk | contribs) 14:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with dhuls. Including examples is acceptable and explicitly allowed in S:NOSP, but that also says "[examples] should only be mentioned in the context of the article. The article should not be or look like an article about that specific project."
- If it's supposed to be examples, it should just be a list, not full subsections for each project.
