Boolean Stuff

Can someone please write a section about the boolean stuff itself? I tried and it didn't go well... :S
Chrischb (talk | contribs) 10:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

What do you mean by the "boolean stuff?" :P
WeirdF (talk | contribs) 16:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
This is kind of pointless...
3sal2 (talk | contribs) 20:27, 14 April 2012 (UTC)


I'm not so sure, hmm.
Krett12 (talk | contribs) 03:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

what does this have to do with booleans?
Mrrecordman (talk | contribs) 19:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

How to Add Section with Block Plugin?

I am trying to add the following to the end of section 'Other Uses', subsection 'Direct Comparison':

"If one requires them both to have a certain input, one can use

<> and <>

block if both conditions should be true, and

<not <> and not <>>

if both conditions should be false."

As you can see, I am having trouble with the second script. I have two questions.

1. Is this okay or would it be unnecessary clutter? 2. If it's okay, how do I get the second block working?

Thanks in advance!

Queer_Royalty (talk | contribs) 02:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

The second script should be this: <<not <>> and <not <>>> (you need extra chevrons around the "not" blocks). In my opinion that would be clutter, since that's basically just restating the definition of the "and" block.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 03:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
i think that block is utterly unecessary. the workaround is too easy. so i would say it is clutter. workaround: <<not <>> and <not <>>>
Mrrecordman (talk | contribs) 19:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.