Do you think all the new Scratch 2.0 features should be named "(Name of feature): Scratch 2.0" So that way, when people look up "Scratch 2.0" all the new features pop up.
Joletole (talk | contribs) 20:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Eh, I don't really think so. We could put all of the Scratch 2.0 feature articles in a particular category though - that way we could link people just to the category and they could learn about all of the new features. :)
Lucario621 (talk | contribs) 20:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Maybe. Or we could just link them to Scratch 2.0#Features.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 08:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

The link doesn't work.

The link to see the contents of a user's backpack doesn't work for me; it says I don't have authorization to view the page. Does the link only work for ST members? If so, should I remove it?
Pianogirl84's Logo.png Pianogirl84 Talk Contributions

Revision on backpack and API

My edit was edited but I do not think that the latest revision conveys the point clearly.

What I was trying to say is that you can only view your own backpack, even through the API. However, the latest revision seems to not make sense to me (nor did my own edit for that matter) - "However, your username must match the username of the person's backpack of the logged in user." is the latest revision.

your username EQUALS the logged in user

is how I interpret that latest revision; wheras it should be

your username EQUALS username of person you are querying

I do not wish to start an edit war and thus am not changing the edit. Thoughts?
Jokebookservice1 (talk | contribs) 19:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I have decided that I will edit the page to simplify the wording so that it is absolutely clear. Discussion is still welcome, however.
Jokebookservice1 (talk | contribs) 20:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
You handled this very nicely.
Anyway, I agree, the current version is clearer about the requirements.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 21:13, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Revising for 3.0

Should this page be updated to include information about the 3.0 backpack, or should a new page be made called "Backpack" and this one be renamed to "Backpack (2.0)"?
-ShadowOfTheFuture- (talk | contribs) 21:51, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

I think we could section this page into 3.0 and 2.0.
12944qwerty Logo.png 12944qwerty  Talk  Contribs  Scratch  00:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.