Would it be better to just make this a redirect to the proper article as appropriate? That has a few advantages:
- Any changes only have to be made in one place
- Doesn't mess with the article count
- No abuse of level 1 headers.
Amiright? 
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 08:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- I support, this page does seem kind-of unnecessary. The article itself would have to be protected though.
Hamish752 (talk | contribs) 09:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- I talked to @LiFaytheGoblin about this earlier, and she supported keeping the two articles separate. I'll leave it up to her to come, if she wants.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 21:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi everyone! I think the redirect idea sounds good! I'll go ahead and make the changes? -
LiFaytheGoblin (Talk) 22:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi everyone! I think the redirect idea sounds good! I'll go ahead and make the changes? -
- I talked to @LiFaytheGoblin about this earlier, and she supported keeping the two articles separate. I'll leave it up to her to come, if she wants.
