Would it be better to just make this a redirect to the proper article as appropriate? That has a few advantages:

  • Any changes only have to be made in one place
  • Doesn't mess with the article count
  • No abuse of level 1 headers.

Scimonster (talk | contribs) 08:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

I support, this page does seem kind-of unnecessary. The article itself would have to be protected though.
Hamish752 (talk | contribs) 09:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I talked to @LiFaytheGoblin about this earlier, and she supported keeping the two articles separate. I'll leave it up to her to come, if she wants.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 21:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi everyone! I think the redirect idea sounds good! I'll go ahead and make the changes? -
LiFaytheGoblin Avatar.png LiFaytheGoblin (Talk) 22:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Great :)
Hamish752 (talk | contribs) 10:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.