Does this exist already?
Is this article pretty much the same as this? It's very similar and has more information than this article. 
Rollercoasterfan (talk | contribs) 20:57, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- When Alternative Accounts gets created, we can merge it there. Otherwise, a merge to Account seems inconsistent so I would keep this page until further notice.
KrIsMa user | talk | contribs | edits 21:51, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Is talking about griffpatch_tutor considered "users or user-generated content?"
It seems like it's advertising; maybe it would be better off if one of the Wiki example accounts were used?
Queer_Royalty (talk | contribs) 20:56, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- In general using real examples is allowed as long as it's only used as an example within the context of the article. However, in this case I agree with you because I think the example is superfluous. jvvg (talk | contribs) 21:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
"Identifying Test Accounts" section is wrong
I think that you don't identify a test account from the username but from the contents he makes. Serci98 (talk | contribs) 11:32, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- Often both. I have a test account called Adzboy_Test, that is identifiable by its username.
Adzboy • Talk • Contributions • Scratch Profile 19:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- I think what's there is fine. It serves as a quick identifier without having to comb through their projects. It's not perfect of course, but works well enough for a first pass. The wording also makes it clear that the method isn't foolproof (by using words such as "often"). jvvg (talk | contribs) 21:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I think what's there is fine. It serves as a quick identifier without having to comb through their projects. It's not perfect of course, but works well enough for a first pass. The wording also makes it clear that the method isn't foolproof (by using words such as "often").
