The citation thing has an error! What is wrong?
Jh1234l (talk | contribs) 05:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Fixed! You need to add a new section caller "References" and add the <references /> tag inside it.
EH7meow (talk | contribs) 13:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Lightnin forums

On the topic here Lightnin and Cheddargirl have made comments. These might be useful for the article, but maybe wait until a solution is clear and this is sorted out.
Wes64 (talk | contribs) 14:33, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Not an entirely new article. I think it should just be added to the current article, at least with Cheddargirl's quote. Also, does this article mention how not to start flame wars or post nasty, opposing comments on add everything studios? It's become an issue.
Turkey3 (talk | contribs) 22:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Useless topic

If I understood it right, Lightnin said that the drama would end if nobody provoked it. So who's genius idea was it to make A WHOLE PAGE DEDICATED TO THIS? I don't even see how this would benefit anybody. I literally don't care if there's over 50 thousand AE studios. The galleries were made to attract attention, and this practically gives them all the ammunition they need.

Explain this dilemma. Now.
Chainmanner (talk | contribs) 23:09, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Please calm down.
Curiouscrab (talk | contribs) 23:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry.
Chainmanner (talk | contribs) 00:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Um, other things that scratchers also argue about, like locking downloads, also have a page or a portion of a page dedicated to it.
Jh1234l (talk | contribs) 04:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Even so, I don't really see any point in creating pages that are explaining discussions, and as you probably saw we've already had some kind of "war" with Add Everything galleries. Obviously this seems more detrimental than helpful, because if another fight starts then they can pretty much use this article. For one, that is.
Chainmanner (talk | contribs) 14:02, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Just because it's bad doesn't mean it's irrelevant. I do agree that this article focuses much more on issues than is necessary - I think people's suggestions should not be included, but the fact that debate occurred should. I believe it is relevant as a whole, because it is likely to a) cause debate again or b) be used as precedent when the scratch team tells people not to have big wars about things.
Wes64 (talk | contribs) 18:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Delete Everything

"Add Nothing" or "Delete Everything" studios are studios that are not supposed to have any projects in it. They generally have a rule that any projects added to the studio will be removed from it by a manager, and sometimes have additional rules. They are often used to protest against Add Everything studios.

Examples:

Add No Projects by LeScratcher Delete Everything! br r2dav2

This might be a useful topic.
3sal2 (talk | contribs) 04:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

agree
Millie S.jpeg Millie S (talk|961 contribs|directory) 04:01, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Title

Isn't the title of this article inconsistent with others? Shouldn't it be "Add Everything Studio"?
veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 21:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

True... I'll fix that.
Edit: I thought you were referring to the capitalization (since Studio for the talk page is lower case). I think Studio should be plural because there are multiple. For example, if you look at the various pages for Project Types, you'll see they use "(something) Projects" instead of "(something) Project"
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 22:30, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
I am referring to the capitalisation; all wiki articles that I'm aware of, besides FAQ pages, are capitalised, so shouldn't this one be as well?
veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 01:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
I was looking at the redirect... My bad. I would agree with you on capitalization, and would suggest making studio plural as well.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 01:24, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
I agree with the suggestion for pluralising it as well.
veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 05:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
If no one disagrees, I think I might as well put in the suggestions tomorrow.
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 04:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes Done
ErnieParke (talk | contribs) 18:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Merge page

I think this page should be merged with the Studio page under a little header. I do realize that it already has a heading there, but I think we should expand that heading instead of keeping this whole article about it. My reasons are...

1) Too specific. If we're making pages about this, we might as well make an entire page about the 'kumquat' fad explaining in detail its history and such, when it really only needs a sidebar or something.

2) Encouraging (sort of) others to fight. When someone sees this page and reads about all the conflict, they'll want to get part of the drama and "fight" in the "war" themselves. If we don't want this, we can instead just cover what they are (not the 'common arguments', etc.) in the studios page.
QuantumPixel (talk | contribs) 14:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Nah, I don't support. AE is common so it deserves a page. But I'll add a template.
PrincessPandaLover (talk | contribs) 23:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
I kind of support the merge.
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 00:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't want to make anybody mad, but what's the big hate over AE studios? I really don't mind them. It's just a minor thing that some people may not like. That doesn't mean it needs it's own page at all. It's like creating topics for a specific kind of project, when it could be put somewhere else.
Rollercoasterfan (talk | contribs) 03:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
As was suggested above, I think it'd be a great idea to merge the two articles and add a secction on Delete Everything studios.
Purplebook163 (talk | contribs) 20:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
I think this article is very helpful and should be left alone. My edits in its history show why.
Mitopolis (talk | contribs) 02:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

New Merge Request

I see it was already asked, but removed, so Ill ask again.
Customhacker Logo Blue.jpg Cυƨтσмнαcκεя ( тαʟκ | cσптяıв ) 22:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

I don't think it should be merged since AE studios were a very significant topic in Scratch history.
jvvg (talk | contribs) 03:58, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Then shouldnt it go in Contreversial Topics or something?
Customhacker Logo Blue.jpg Cυƨтσмнαcκεя ( тαʟκ | cσптяıв ) 18:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
I think it is significant enough to stay on its own.
CrazyBoy826-Icon.png CrazyBoy826 Talk | Contribs | Scratch account
22:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

What i am thinking.

I think that they should merge this article about AE's with the studio article. I think it work well on the same page if it was smaller. I think that this is something that has something to do with the studios article and should be added into it.
Purplewolves (talk | contribs) 01:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

I think they should just add another subheading on the studio page and talk about this. I mean this is still related to studios


Asqwde (talk | contribs) 21:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

I agree with Asqwde. But I think that this page should exist - I mean, they got so much information about and it looks like the creator spent a while, soooo.....


EIephant Lover (talk | contribs) 3:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

It should not be merged. The studios article already has a small section about AE studios with {{main}}.
Millie S.jpeg Millie S (talk|961 contribs|directory) 00:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.