Is it just me or is it silly to make a separate article for every block. Its like having Wikipedia make an individual article for every letter in the English language. I think that there should be 1 article per type of blocks ie. motion, sensing. --Archmage 23:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z Apart from that ( ;) ) I kind of like the idea of having 1 article per block. Lots of them have extra examples or help on how to use the block. It also helps people to find help about it faster and after all, I don't really see a disadvantage. JSO 11:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

If all the Motion blocks shared an article and such, each block would get such a vague place. And with having an article for each block, we get a nice description for them, possibly a workaround, and common uses. :D
Jonathanpb (talk | contribs) 11:41, 19 July 2010 (UTC)