(Comment)
(Comment)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
{{User:AonymousGuy/Sig}} 03:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 
{{User:AonymousGuy/Sig}} 03:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 
:Yes, I think of that as advertising Zro716. <scratchsig>Mitopolis</scratchsig> 21:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 
:Yes, I think of that as advertising Zro716. <scratchsig>Mitopolis</scratchsig> 21:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
:Yes, I definitely agree. It is making the assumption that everyone already knows about Zro716. <scratchsig>Srevilo</scratchsig> 06:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
+
::Yes, I definitely agree. It is making the assumption that everyone already knows about Zro716. <scratchsig>Srevilo</scratchsig> 06:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 +
:::I agree. It is like as if it's expecting you to know about Zro716. (I also fixed the indenting stuff.) <scratchsig>Ziggy741</scratchsig> 00:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
  
 
== Famous Trends ==
 
== Famous Trends ==

Revision as of 00:50, 22 August 2016

Potential concern

I haven't been on the wiki in a long time, so I'm not completely sure whether this is of concern or not.

However, it seems to me that this article is written in a way that *almost* violates S:NOSP - many of the users mentioned and the like feel too... personal (?) almost?

Like, for example, here, I am sort of bothered by "This was started by Zro716 and has spread slowly." It seems almost like it's addressing Zro716 as someone familiar to every reader. I personally think that it would be better worded as "This was started by the user Zro716 and has spread slowly" or something similar.

As I said, I haven't been on the wiki in a long time, so I'm not really sure what other people might think about this. That's why I'm curious to see others' opinions.
Userlogoaonymousguy.png AonymousGuy (talk | contribs | Scratch account) 03:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I think of that as advertising Zro716.
Mitopolis (talk | contribs) 21:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Yes, I definitely agree. It is making the assumption that everyone already knows about Zro716.
Srevilo (talk | contribs) 06:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
I agree. It is like as if it's expecting you to know about Zro716. (I also fixed the indenting stuff.)
Ziggy741 (talk | contribs) 00:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Famous Trends

How famous does a trend have to be to be able to be mentioned in this article?
Ziggy741 (talk | contribs) 17:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Bump. (Will bumping work?)
Ziggy741 (talk | contribs) 00:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)