Scimonster (talk | contribs) m (→Usefulness) |
Hardmath123 (talk | contribs) (→Usefulness) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Maybe. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 17:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC) | :::Maybe. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 17:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::I think it would be most appropriate to merge with [[Animation-The Basics]]{{User:Bsteward/sig}}22:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC) | :::I think it would be most appropriate to merge with [[Animation-The Basics]]{{User:Bsteward/sig}}22:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::I say we totally don't need this. It adds no value to the Wiki whatsoever, really.<scratchsig>Hardmath123</scratchsig> 16:04, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:04, 6 August 2012
Usefulness
Is this really neccesary to be a seperate article? This could be merged with Animations. 
Wolvesstar97 (talk | contribs) 20:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. Also, it's not Scratch-specific and it's in second person, which is bad form.
Veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 23:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC) - I think it could be... we hardly have any real animating tutorials that focus on the drawing, rather than the scripting. It could be renamed to Drawing cartoons, and re-written to be wiki-like.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 09:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Or Drawing Animations. I think "animation" is a better term than "cartoon". Wolvesstar97 (talk | contribs) 16:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe. Scimonster (talk | contribs) 17:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- I think it would be most appropriate to merge with Animation-The Basics
Bsteward (talk | contribs)22:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- I say we totally don't need this. It adds no value to the Wiki whatsoever, really.
Hardmath123 (talk | contribs) 16:04, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I say we totally don't need this. It adds no value to the Wiki whatsoever, really.
- Maybe.
- Or Drawing Animations. I think "animation" is a better term than "cartoon".
