(Usefulness)
(Usefulness)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:Agreed. Also, it's not Scratch-specific and it's in second person, which is bad form. <scratchsig>Veggieman001</scratchsig> 23:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 
:Agreed. Also, it's not Scratch-specific and it's in second person, which is bad form. <scratchsig>Veggieman001</scratchsig> 23:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 
:I think it could be... we hardly have any real animating tutorials that focus on the drawing, rather than the scripting. It could be renamed to ''Drawing cartoons'', and re-written to be wiki-like. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 09:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 
:I think it could be... we hardly have any real animating tutorials that focus on the drawing, rather than the scripting. It could be renamed to ''Drawing cartoons'', and re-written to be wiki-like. <scratchsig>Scimonster</scratchsig> 09:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
::Or ''Drawing Animations''. I think "animation" is a better term than "cartoon". <scratchsig>Wolvesstar97</scratchsig> 16:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:53, 13 June 2012

Usefulness

Is this really neccesary to be a seperate article? This could be merged with Animations.
Wolvesstar97 (talk | contribs) 20:17, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. Also, it's not Scratch-specific and it's in second person, which is bad form.
Veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 23:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
I think it could be... we hardly have any real animating tutorials that focus on the drawing, rather than the scripting. It could be renamed to Drawing cartoons, and re-written to be wiki-like.
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 09:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Or Drawing Animations. I think "animation" is a better term than "cartoon".
Wolvesstar97 (talk | contribs) 16:53, 13 June 2012 (UTC)