View source for Scratch Wiki talk:Community Portal

{{April Fools}}{{/Help Box}}{{good style|cat-at-end}}
<noinclude>[[Category:Community]]</noinclude>
== Bulletin Board for Not-Done Topics ==
{{not done}} (this will never be done completely, so don't archive!)

Threads that need "long time and hard work" will not be archived, but moved to [[S:CPND]].

Here's some things that we need your help for.

=== <span id="Not done">Other Topics</span> ===
Topics that are not listed above.

==== About Scratch 3.0 ====
* [[S:CPND#A Thorough Discussion on Thinking of the Past, Present, Future, and Organizing them All]]
* [[S:CPND#3.0 updating]]
* [[S:CPND#What should we call the Scratch 3.0 player?]]
* [[S:CPND#3.0 updating question]]
* [[S:CPND#Articles to update for 3.0]]

==== Articles ====
* [[S:CPND#Split the Paint Article]]
* [[S:CPND#New page for mall simulators]]
* [[S:CPND#Tinkercad Codeblocks]]
* [[S:CPND#Merging Cloud Data Articles?]]
* [[S:CPND#Naming Blocks]]
* [[S:CPND#How to Connect to the Physical World Is really outdated]]
* [[S:CPND#RfC about User:Gdpr000001, User talk:Gdpr000001 and S:B redirects]]

==== About Wiki Management ====
===== Backend =====
* [[S:CPND#Embedding of Scratch Projects]]
* [[S:CPND#Block Problems]]
* [[S:CPND#Scratchblocks Plugin not Working]]
* [[S:CPND#A flaw in the "Random Page" button I see]]
* [[S:CPND#Linking Style Sheets]]
* [[S:CPND#Misdirected Request error]]
* [[S:CPND#RfC about the usage of fixed with in ScratchWikiSkin2]]
* [[S:CPND#Megathread: MediaWiki Version Bump]]
* [[S:CPND#Increase the file size thingy (read this to get it)]]
* [[S:CPND#RfC for Interface admins group]]

===== Page Management =====
* [[S:CPND#Help:Contents Is missing some help pages]]
* [[S:CPND#Not Done doesn't get enough attention]]
* [[S:CPND#Not Done]]
* [[S:CPND#List of deleted pages]]
* [[S:CPND#Scratch Wiki Adventure]]
* [[S:CPND#Tip of the Day]]
* [[S:CPND#An idea]]
* [[S:CPND#Suggestion: Resolved and Unresolved Templates]]
* [[S:CPND#GitHub interwiki links]]
* [[S:CPND#make templates like trout]]

===== Rules =====
* [[S:CPND#custom signatures]]
* [[S:CPND#Account Request Notes]]
* [[S:CPND#We have to delete Fair Use]]
* [[S:CPND#Relax S:NOSP even more]]
* [[S:CPND#Suggestion: Scratch Wiki:Featured Image Suggestions]]
* [[S:CPND#“Secret” Compliments]]
* [[S:CPND#Suggestion: Mention that the Privacy Policy and Disclaimers are in German]]
* [[S:CPND#When are we planning to implement the new Flawed Article?]]
* [[S:CPND#Constructiveness in Community Portal - An Idea]]
* [[S:CPND#Require custom welcome messages to be transcluded]]
* [[S:CPND#Custom Signatures]]
* [[S:CPND#Suggestion: Have a dedicated page for feedback on the account request system]]
* [[S:CPND#Would it possible to prevent users from using external links to wiki pages in the AbuseFilter?]]
* [[S:CPND#Allowing borders in custom sigs]]
* [[S:CPND#Tone down the rejected messages on S:BR archives]]

===== Interwiki =====
* [[S:CPND#We need your help: Apply for getting "International Scratch Wiki Coach"]]
* [[S:CPND#Why is Interwiki not possible in the english community-portal?]]
* [[S:CPND#Centralized Cross-Wiki Discussion]]

===== Community =====
* [[S:CPND#Scratch Wiki YT Channel]]
* [[S:CPND#Scratch Wiki talk:Community Portal/Archive 107#Tell users on Wiki Wednesday topics not to spam in replies continuation]]

To make sure that your thread will not be archived put the template {{not done}} at the top.

Don't forget to replace it with the {{done}} template when the thread is finally finished.

{{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 11:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
:(I have edited this topic a little from its original version){{User:Kenny2scratch/sig}} 08:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
::Should we add a rejected topics section so that we know which ones to archive? <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 22:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
:::Done.
:::Updated the list as the author.{{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 09:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
::::Updated! {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 10:43, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
:::::Updated. {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 14:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

== Logging server faults ==
{{not done|Never Done}}

[[/Logging server faults|See dedicated subpage]]{{User:Kenny2scratch/sig}} 09:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

== Change external Scratch links to interwiki links automatically ==

{{done}}<br/>It could be helpful. So, I suggest it.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 15:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
:TemplatesFTW [[Special:Diff/254239|already does that]]; or do you mean a different way of automating it? {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 16:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
::Do you mean that you don't have to use the external link markup when linking a scratch profile, ect...? That could be helpful...{{User:ContourLines/Signature}} 06:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
:::@ContourLines  {{-}} you already don't have to use the external markup. In fact, [[S:STYLE]] says not to use the external link markup (see [[Scratch Wiki:Style Guide#internal-scratch-links|#internal-scratch-links]]). You can use <code><nowiki>[[users:USERNAME]]</nowiki></code> for users, <code><nowiki>[[studios:ID]]</nowiki></code> for studios, and <code><nowiki>[[projects:ID]]</nowiki></code> for projects. Ahmetlii suggested to change external links to these interwiki links automatically, then I said that TemplatesFTW already does it. {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 16:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
::::I actually proposed the Scratch Links and added it to [[S:STYLE]] (: Anyway, I didn't see that TemplatesFTW does that, yea, I think it was good to add it to the bot. {{User:VFDan/Sig}} 03:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
:::::Ahmetlii, I think this is {{done}}; is that correct? {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 19:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

== How do I make a fill width CSS for SWS2 ==

As per title. <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 21:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

== Thankful Thursday! September 24{{th}}, 2020 ==
{{Scratch Wiki:Thankful Thursday/archive 032}}

{{quote|There are many more people on this wiki who deserve these comments just as much as those who received them. :) Everyone is special and brings their own ideas. The more of us there are, the better the community spirit. Sadly, I must sign off now- <scratchsig>Makethebrainhappy</scratchsig> 01:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)}}


The next TT is, October 29{{th}}, see you then!

{{done}}{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 12:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
: wow big thanks <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 12:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
::Whoa! Thanks! {{E|:)}}{{User:4096bits/Signature}} 13:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

== Merge Check users and Supressors user groups with bureaucrats or administrators ==

Except for the Interface Admin user group, two other user groups were added in the new MediaWiki upgrade. They are mentioned in the title of this topic. I think those groups are unnecessary and could be merged and have their rights moved to other usergroups. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 05:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
: These were actually removed already removed in 28, but were inadvertently restored by the upgrade. However, I personally feel like they should not be removed for a number of reasons:
:: 1) CheckUser and Suppressor inherently mean access to confidential information, which is usually specifically mentioned in the privacy policy. Voting in users for bureaucrat should not typically result in access to private information. 
:: 2) Users who have access to such information generally are scrutinized much more than users who do not. Suppressors need to deal with PII like real names, home addresses, and anything else like that. It is not the role of a bureaucrat to handle stuff like that.
:: 3) Scratch Wiki has a tendency to treat user groups like a hierarchy (i.e. Bureaucrat is better than sysop, which is better than Experienced Wikian). I think that these three new user groups help remove this bad aura.
:: 4) Bureaucrat does not have an age requirement, but I do not want minors to have access to the information that CheckUsers and Suppressors do.
:: There are a number of other reasons as well that they should not be merged, but this is just off the top of my head. Comments about Interface admin can be directed to a couple threads above this, which I assume Jammum has seen. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 05:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
::: For your last statement, literally 99% of users ''are'' under the age of 18. I'm a minor, and I feel extremely offended by this comment. It just enforces a stereotype that everyone under the age of 13 is dumb. Also, it wouldn't be a fair opportunity for everyone. I know that admins are encouraged to have access to the discord server, but it is not mandatory.
::: For your 2nd statement, there isn't much personal info on my (and everyone else's) account. As long as you trust (or the majority trusts) the user, you'll be fine. <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 12:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
::::I don't see anything about 'all people under 13 are dumb' in the post above yours. Also there is definently personal info in our accounts - I wouldn't really want people to be able to see my email address.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 15:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
:::::<s>Support to @Dominic305. There's also a legal side; we must ensure that someone is not using emails for email hacking or phishing - that's why we must give these roles to people that older 13 (for juridical capacity) and trusted users by the community. This doesn't mean that people under 13 is dumb, but that's risky - give a user that does not have juridical capacity may make unwanted legal consequences.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 16:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)</s>
:::::: After reading these, I have a proposal. There should be 2 bureaucrat ranks. One for users under the age of 13, and one for users over the age of 13. If a user is elected or appointed bureaucrat, and they happen to be underage, they would get a similar rank to normal bureaucrat but the permissions regarding the viewing and changing of personal information would be removed. This wouldn't be publicised unless the user does it themselves. <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 18:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
{{outdent|6}}
Imho nobody needs to have those perms. And just because somebody is over 13, they're automatically not going to do anything malicious with the emails? I signed up with my personal email, and I don't want anybody to know my name (I prefer anonymity). Besides, how would you know they are 13? I can easily say I'm 22, although that's a blatant lie. How would allowing any user group to view emails benefit the wiki? {{User:VFDan/Sig}} 20:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
: First of all, the age in question would be 18 and not 13 as 13-year-olds are still minors and are not legally able to sign non-disclosure agreements (although they are able to be bound by privacy policies). Also, I think that simply having two groups based on age only (halfway) solves one of the issues at hand and does not solve any of the others. For example, one could be granted CheckUser/Supressor and not bureaucrat; or bureaucrat and not CheckUser/Suppressor. The two groups should not be merged into bureaucrat, and I think that having seperate groups for users who are over or under 13 is simply problematic, discriminatory, and does not solve the issues at all. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 20:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
: To VFDan, while asking for a users' birthday is sufficient for COPPA compliance, for access to confidential information, proof of legal identification is usually required, and lying about the age would immediately be found out. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 20:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
:: If the age would be 18, then let's just get rid of literally every single admin or EW! I have a hunch that almost every EW/Admin is under 18, leaving the very few 18+ admins to do all the work. Many adults have jobs to do, and that explains their activity. <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 21:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
:::I agree that no one should need to see user emails.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 14:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
::::Support (for merging groups). We don't need more groups, and most of the bureaucrats can view any content stored in a database. Also we don't have a way to confirm their age.
::::It's also important to see what is "confidential" - I am not sure if we ever used "suppress". We always used normal revision delete, and I am not sure if there is any information that should be hidden from admins. (note: EWs can't view deleted revisions) There are variety of things removed from a page - mostly email and social media/chat website links, and "hiding vandalism". Email or chat website links, IMO, aren't confidential enough to require suppression. Only certain PIIs like home addresses, phone numbers or social security numbers would need suppression, and I personally have never seen someone putting their home address on this wiki. Hiding vandalism is just to prevent name-and-shame by the viewers of the Wiki. If you think they should be oversighted, then we should fire admins that do bad things instead.
::::There could be some legal reasons to use oversighting but I honestly don't think that'll happen. As far as I know, there is no law that enforces us to remove links to social media.
::::While IP address could be considered confidential, again, I don't think there is a reason to have separate group.
::::Naleksuh mentioned that current system is like a hierarchy - and that is true. However, this is supposed to happen. Bureaucrats have more privileges than admins because they are responsible for maintaing all Scratch Wikis. They are like stewards in Wikimedia wikis. Administrators have basic privileges for managing one wiki, and EWs help admins, easier to obtain (than admins) but with less privileges.
::::I probably should also mention one more thing - currently, there is only one active bureaucrat. If we have groups for CheckUser and suppression, it is kinda obvious that there will be less CheckUsers than bureaucrats, especially with an age requirement. However, both CUs and suppressors are essential (if we actually use them, which we never did for suppressors) when fighting vandalism.
::::I understand that we are not Wikipedia - but given that the whole idea of suppressor and checkuser groups came from Wikimedia wikis, I think we shouldn't forget this fact: Stewards can use both CheckUser and Oversight. Stewards are people who assign groups, and help people cross-wiki. There is one existing group that basically does the same job, on Scratch Wikis, which is bureaucrat. Bureaucrats (with some exceptions, if any) have access to all Scratch Wikis, as bureaucrats, and can modify the database and the files at will, and have full control over Scratch Wikis.
::::This discussion could be bumped when we introduce actual per-wiki bureaucrats. However, we don't have them yet, so for now there is no use for separate user groups.
::::Also one note: who is minor and who isn't, totally depends on the country. {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 08:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::Apple, no one cares about age. Ken has been a bureaucrat since he was 14. Me, an EW since 14. All of us started being an EW as minors, and some bureaucrats and administrators. Suppression is hiding edit summaries. Email and chat are very confidential and should be removed. Not all bureaucrats are on all wikis.  <br/>{{User:Banana439monkey/infrastructure/sig}} 11:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
::::::: No, giving minors access to legally confidential information contains legal problems to no end. The "we don't have a way to confirm their age" further confirms a lack of understanding. As Banana said, the information here is not simply hiding vandalism or certain edit summaries and may not under any circumstances be made available to non-functionaries. Merge {{not done}} <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 18:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
{{outdent|6}}
:I'm not sure what you mean by "legally confidential information". There are some information that are definitely confidential - like social security number, but I've never seen them posted on the wiki. PIIs are probably included in that category, but I don't think it's a common problem. Emails and IP addresses may be considered as PII. Note that links to social media, common reason of per-revision deletion, are mostly banned for moderation reasons; There is little to no reason to use oversight for those.
:Of those confidential information, which are legally confidential, and which cause legal problems when accessed by minors? I do not know details on German laws, but if I remember correctly, GDPR did not enforce such restrictions (or am i wrong?)
:This is a technical fact that I am sure it's correct: "suppression" and "oversight" have the same meaning. Suppression includes suppressing revision, edit summary, log, etc.
:To be honest, I don't think we are legally required to remove "confidential information" - without requests from them. Wiki contents are intended to be public, so submitting contents would mean agreeing to make them public. There may be some legal cases where this doesn't apply, but I'm sure we (most of the time) remove confidential information to reduce harm (to them) caused by making them public, and is not because of legal obligations.
:We probably can restrict access to raw IP address because I don't think we ever used them - we just need to confirm that two accounts are owned by the same IP.
:Also, remember that [[metawikipedia:Access to nonpublic personal data policy/Underage exemptions|even Wikimedia has exemptions to age requirement!]] {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 09:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
::I don't really see a need for somebody knowing my email. There is absolutely no reason to know any PIIs besides the IP address. {{User:VFDan/Sig}} 13:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
:::Email is not exposed to CUs/Suppressors, unless you write it on the wiki pages, which is probably your fault. {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 00:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

== Minor Grammatical Issue in Footer ==

It says "Privacy policy" instead of Privacy Policy. Should not this be fixed? <scratchsig>R4356th</scratchsig> 17:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
:It's same though and I think that it should not be capitalized because of it's a general title (bundled with MediaWiki).{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}}
::It's capitalized on Scratch though <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 18:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
:::Should we copy everything on Scratch's footer to here? There are a lot of links there that aren't here.... <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 18:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
:::: This is not a "grammatical issue" or something that must be "fixed"-- capitalization like that is common, but Scratch Wiki has the idea of Capitalizing Everything Ever. For example, the default capitalization for [[Special:RecentChanges]] is <code>Recent chamges</code>, but was changed on Scratch Wiki to <code>Recent changes</code>. As for copying over the Scratch footer, a rewrite of ScratchWikiSkin into ScratchWikiSkin3 was proposed on Discord, but I do not know if that is happening. Currently, the skin uses various MediaWiki messages, usually introducing new ones, but sometimes using existing ones, which I would guess Privacy policy is one of those cases. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 20:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

== November Featured Images ==

{{done}}

I just updated the [[S:FI|featured images]] with suggestions from the CP. Does anyone have any ideas for the next set of featured images (which will come at the end of October or the beginning of November)? If so, please post them here. Thanks! {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 03:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
: How about [[File:Report.PNG]]? <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 11:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
::I suggest [[:File:Change profile pic.png]]. {{e|:)}}
::<small>@garnetluvcookie That image doesn't exist, do you mean [[:File:Report Screen.PNG]]?</small> <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 22:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
:::<small> yes, I do, I just have the worst short term memory ever :P</small><br/>{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 23:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
::::I suggest [[:File:Scratch Team.jpg]] or [[:File:Join Flow 7.png]]. {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 12:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::Is there an archive where all the previous images are listed ? {{unsigned|Scratcheur-2020Send}} 10:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
::::::Heh, sorry it took so long for me to update them. I added [[:File:Report Screen.PNG]], [[:File:Change profile pic.png]], and [[:File:Scratch Team.jpg]]. If you think anything should be changed (like one of the descriptions), please let me know. {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 18:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
{{outdent|6}}Scratcheur-2020Send, check out [[:Category:Featured Articles/Images]] (scroll down to "Media in category 'Featured Articles/Images'"). {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 18:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

== A proposal for talk page formatting ==
{{not done}}<br>
So when we edit on talk pages, we seem to just keep indenting over and over, without any logic. I was thinking we could instead indent to show who we are replying to, sort of like [[Special:PermanentLink/263442|this example]]. It would more clearly show who each person is talking to and clear up confusion. New posts would still go below old posts, but instead under what you're replying to. I'm pretty bad at explaining so you can ask for any clarification. What are your thoughts?{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 01:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
:An idea similar to (or the same as) this idea [[Scratch Wiki talk:Community Portal/Archive 94#A suggestion/question about indentation in replies|has been suggested before]], back in 2017 (wow, time flies!). I just thought I'd point that out so you could read the discussion. Also, a system where you indent to show who you're replying to is already used in some discussions by several users (see [[#RfC about the usage of fixed with in ScratchWikiSkin2]] for an example); but it isn't the most used system, I suppose. {{e|:)}}
:<small>Also, this is nitpicking at semantics, but I would disagree with your statement that our current most popular system is "without any logic"; the very fact that users following the convention must indent one <code>:</code> more than the previous post gives it logic. However, again, this is nitpicking. {{e|;)}}</small><br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 01:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
::It seems that no one ever actually came to a decision, so maybe I'll invite some people to this discussion?{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 14:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
:::Hmm... I agree that there is no logical order in which we indent currently, but the alternative proposal you're suggesting also will get very complicated for longer topics. You wouldn't know who you're replying to. (This is just in my head, I'm not sure if this will work or not, my imagination says it's not going to work but I can't be so sure :D ) <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 17:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
::::We could still use things like "@kaj: Why did you hack my friend?" and stuff to prevent confusion.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 18:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::We could just do a template like Wikipedia's "talk page" template. Anyway, nobody cannot force someone for something, so the best thing is explanation.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 18:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::IMO this is more confusing than the current system; we should just keep indenting the way we do now. Using stuff like "@kaj: please don't hack me I didn't do anything wrong" is more clear IMO. And often you might not be replying to anyone in particular, so where do you put it then? {{User:VFDan/Sig}} 14:32, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
::::::I'm not saying we completely ditch @ing people. As for not replying in particular, that would be indent level 0.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 15:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
{{outdent|6}}This seems more confusing for me in long topics, even with using @mention in every message. For short topics, this wouldn't be too confusing, but overall, I disagree with this idea.
These are just my thoughts though; maybe we could make this technique less complex for long topics? <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 22:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

== LEGO BOOST Page ==
We have pages about the Raspberry PI system, the LEGO WeDo Construction Set system, but I'm noticing we don't have one about LEGO BOOST. I have a very less knowledge about this stuff (as always), so could somebody please take the effort to create a page containing all the information? Thanks.<scratchsig>Nambaseking01</scratchsig> 17:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
:Actually, we already have one at [[LEGO BOOST Extension]], unless you mean something else. {{e|:)}} {{User:Groko13/Signature}} 20:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
:: No {{-}} do you notice the red link labelled "LEGO BOOST"? Unless I'm misinterpreting it, there should be page related to what that is and how it's related to the extension. For example, the Raspberry Pi has a page about it's Scratch extension but also about it's hardware and how it's relevant to Scratch.<scratchsig>Nambaseking01</scratchsig> 12:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

== Capitalization issue with 3.0 blocks ==

Hey folks, I've been working on a project to fix and improve the LEGO BOOST extension for a while now and it's complete, but while I was doing it I noticed an issue with the 3.0 blocks on the Wiki: all of the lowercase "i"s kept turning into a capital "i" and in the code it was still lowercase. I don't know if this is a known issue, but it could be misleading. <scratchsig>Nambaseking01</scratchsig> 12:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

== Missing Discussions ==

Hello, everyone! After creating the [[Scratch Wiki talk:Community Portal/Archive 109|109{{th}} Community Portal archive]], I moved quite a few discussions to [[Scratch Wiki talk:Community Portal/Not Done]]. One upside of this is to prevent premature archiving of the CP. If you're wondering where a discussion went, it was probably either archived or moved to Not Done. Please also consider contributing to some of the discussions in Not Done!  {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 19:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

== Reminder ==

I’d like to remind y’all (no, I’m not from Kentucky or near there) that you shouldn’t assume others gender, even from their mediawiki preferences. For example, I have my gender set as “female” in my settings, though I don’t use female pronouns. It’s always best to ask someone for their pronouns, or just use the neutral pronoun “they”. <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 03:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
:I definitely agree that you shouldn't assume others' pronouns; however, I'm not sure how referring to someone based on their MediaWiki preferences is doing that. The MediaWiki preferences actually don't use the words "male," "female," etc.; they [http://u.cubeupload.com/bigpuppy/PronounsMediaWiki.png explicitly ask about your pronouns]. So, if someone has that preference set as "she," for instance, then I don't think that referring to them as "she" is "assuming their gender." Of course, if someone prefers to be called something other than what is listed on that page, then users should use what they prefer instead, but then they probably wouldn't change the preference from the default (as you called it, "neutral") option ("they"). Could you please clarify why you think that referring to someone based on the pronouns they have said they prefer to be described as is "assuming their gender"? Thank you. {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 03:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
:: I’m pretty sure that that changed during the update, and plus the mw magic word is gender, so misconceptions can be made. Also, I’d like to also not that someone’s gender identity doesn’t always have to line up with their pronouns (for example, I identify as a cis female and present myself irl as feminine, but I prefer gender neutral pronouns on the internet because my internet “persona” is way more different than I act in real life.) <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 04:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
:: I’d also like to note as a “straight” and “cis” ally, though this isn’t used anymore, he/she or she/he is not an OK substitute for the perfectly fine gender neutral pronoun “they”. <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 04:11, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
:::* ''"I’m pretty sure that that changed during the update, ..."''
:::** Are you ''100%'' sure about that? We shouldn't assume whether it did or not. Anyhow, we can get confirmation on this.
:::* ''"... and plus the mw magic word is gender, so misconceptions can be made."''
:::** Misconceptions can be made about anything. You just need to clear them up so they don't get made again. The purpose of that preference is so that the software knows how to correctly refer to you, so saying that you shouldn't use it as a guide to know how to refer to users goes against the point of it.
:::* ''"Also, I’d like to also not that someone’s gender identity doesn’t always have to line up with their pronouns (for example, I identify as a cis female and present myself irl as feminine, but I prefer gender neutral pronouns on the internet because my internet “persona” is way more different than I act in real life.)"''
:::** This is irrelevant here. As I said, the purpose of that preference is so that the software knows how to correctly refer to you, and hence it explicitly asks about your pronouns. If someone represents that preference as anything else, they are misrepresenting the preference.
:::* ''"I’d also like to note as a 'straight' and 'cis' ally, though this isn’t used anymore, he/she or she/he is not an OK substitute for the perfectly fine gender neutral pronoun 'they'."''
:::** I agree, but that's a different issue; why are you bringing it up here?
:::My points are not meant to sound harsh (I'm sorry if they do), but I'm just trying to make sure that the purpose of that preference is being addressed. Again, I agree that you shouldn't assume others' pronouns, but I disagree that using this preference to refer to someone is doing so. {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 04:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
:::: I get your points, but as someone who has many queer friends who feel strongly about this and so do I, (pardon me if I sound odd or rude, I’m a bit sleepy) and I just wanted to bring it up as a friendly reminder because it’s never OK to assume one’s gender, and in modern times we need to learn that. My opinions may be a bit biased, but you get the point. <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 04:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::Now you're changing the topic of what we're discussing. We're not discussing whether it's okay to assume users' genders (or assume users' pronouns); I think we both agree that it's never okay to do that. What we're discussing is whether using someone's pronoun preferences to refer to them is assuming their pronouns; and I don't think that referring to someone as "he" (for example) if they have selected that they prefer to be referred to as "he" is doing that. {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 04:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
::::: I get it now. Since it’s almost 1 AM where I am and I literally don’t have the mental energy to go in depth about anything, I’m going to call this done. if you have other concerns, feel free to contact me on my talk page sine I’ll still have this on until I fall asleep involuntarily. (Wikipedia editor moment)<br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 04:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
::::::Alright, let's make it official: {{done}}. Have a good rest of your night. {{e|:)}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 04:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

== "Becoming a Scratcher" section ==

I'm going to make a section on either [[Scratcher]] or [[New Scratcher]] about how you become a Scratcher (with images for each slide of the process). Which article should I do it on?{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 11:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
:I would say on [[Scratcher]] but make a section in [[New Scratcher]] summarizing the how-to.  <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 15:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
::So something like [https://en.scratch-wiki.info/w/index.php?title=User:Dominic305/Sandbox-alt&oldid=263783 this]?{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 15:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
:::Yes, like that...
:::<small>You don't have to link a difference externally, you can just do [[Special:Diff/273783]]...</small> <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 15:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

== What should I do if... ==
{{done}}<br>

What should I do if someone posts a message on my talk page just in the middle of nowhere with no subject or anything, just a message? (It still has a sig){{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 20:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
:You can create a title for it and you can say "Message from ...".{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 20:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
::Ok, thanks!{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 20:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
:::I would say that you could just read the text, and make a subject based on that. The header is used for others to know what the basis of the conversation would be about. <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 20:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
::::@12944qwerty: if it's not included a clear subject, my suggestion may be the preferred; I think.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 20:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::Agreed I guess. A message, if not clear, could just say "Message from ..." but I doubt that would happen often... <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 13:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

== Making search boxes ==
{{done}}<br />
Is there a way to make search boxes in the Scratch Wiki, like the one on top of the CP, except with the "Try exact match" button and the line break before the buttons? {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 21:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
:The Try Exact Match button is part of the input box. After playing around with the <code><nowiki><inputbox></nowiki></code> tag, I found that the type of <code>type=search2</code> will give the Exact match button. <code>type=search</code> gives both buttons. <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 13:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
::Alright, thanks. {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 14:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

== Boi wut ==
{{done}}<br>
[https://ibb.co/GkrNHnm]<br>There's a glitch that allows Scratchers to see dustbin topics, using 'Report Post'. Would it be notable enough if others can do it to include in the Dustbin forum topic article? Try it yourself with [https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/misc/?action=report&post_id=4488556 this link].{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 11:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
:But you don't see the topic..... <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 13:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
::True, though you can see the title. <scratchsig>GrahamSH</scratchsig> 13:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
:::Does the title really matter though? I would think that the discussion would be more important. <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 14:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
::::I don't know, it probably wouldn't be any good. I kinda just wanted to show everyone because I thought it was interesting, without people saying it's off-topic...{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 14:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::I clicked the link again and now it says 'Spam Dustbin'. I do not see any mentions of 'Spam Dustbin', I only see 'Dustbin'. Does anyone have more information on this?{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 17:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

== Error while viewing GIF ==

Every time I try to load a thumbnail of the file [[:File:Rickroll.gif]], it displays this error:<br/>
"Error creating thumbnail: convert: memory allocation failed `/tmp/transform_177876bbf04e.gif' @ error/quantize.c/QuantizeImage/2653. convert: memory allocation failed `/tmp/transform_177876bbf04e.gif' @ error/gif.c/WriteGIFImage/1693. Error code: 1"
<br/>Can someone help me? Thanks. {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 17:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
:Hmm, I'm getting this error for only the thumbnails. The main gif at the top of the screen works perfectly fine for me <br/>{{User:12944qwerty/Templates/Sig}} 16:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
::Yewh, when I uploaded the image the wiki was running slow; also it's a big file so that's most likely a big part of the cause.<br><small><small>You just got RickRolled</small></small>{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 01:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

== Is this a bug or what ==

In the www version ([https://www.en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/Scratch_Wiki_Home this link]), it appears that you are signed out, but remove the www, you're signed in? Is this a bug, glitch, or something I missed because I'm now on the main site? <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 19:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
:@garnetluvcookie: It's probably proposed as a redirect to the main subdomain (en.scratch-wiki.info) but however; since MediaWiki handles for only a subdomain, it's kinda unnecessary right now. The all links from www subdomain will be redirected to the main subdomain. It's not a bug nor a glitch neither a missed thing. You can also see the same thing on www.scratch.mit.edu . The fact is www subdomains are unused in most of the websites in the Internet, but the website bureaucrats redirects them to main domain/subdomain for preventing confusion.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 20:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
::That's because the cookies are only saved for the domain for which they are issued, and www.en.scratch-wiki.info and en.scratch-wiki.info are different domains. We would strongly encourage just using en.scratch-wiki.info (without the www) to avoid such issues.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 00:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

== Subject glitch ==

If you can see from [https://assets.scratch.mit.edu/get_image/.%2E/f79d37e181e48349faf440cf17df22b0.png this] image, if you hover over the "Subject" line when making a new section, a tooltip will appear about summaries, not subjects.
<br/>Can someone fix this? Thanks {{E|:)}} {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 21:51, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
:There is no problem here, the subject box is for writing a "summary" of your post.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 01:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

== New ScratchSig is deployed! ==

A few weeks ago, Naleksuh suggested we should develop a new ScratchSig since the old one was woefully out of date and generally a kind of hacky extension (some of you may recall the XSS vulnerability discovered a while ago). Naleksuh and I have developed a newer version of the extension that is now deployed here. The only obvious difference should be that the image does not have a border on it anymore and that userpages/talk pages that do not exist appear as redlinks since those are now rendered as wikitext instead of raw HTML. This also does finally properly handle usernames with underscores, and you can enter the username either with spaces or underscores, depending on which you prefer, and the icon will display properly. Also, for users that do not exist, the icon simply will not display.

Examples representing the situations I mentioned above:
:<scratchsig>jvvg test</scratchsig>
:<scratchsig>jvvg_test</scratchsig>
:<scratchsig>this user cannot exist %%</scratchsig>

Additionally, there have been some behind the scenes changes. We took a much more defensive approach to the design of the extension to avoid any future XSS attacks or similar. We also added a much better caching system using the [[mediawikiwiki:Manual:Caching|MediaWiki object cache]]. For comparison, the older version was still using [[Scratch_Wiki_talk:Community_Portal/Archive_95#Community_Portal_must_get_faster|a kind of janky caching system added over two years ago that was intended to be temporary]].

Please post a reply here if you notice any issues. And of course I need to ''actually'' sign my post even though this is a post about scratchsig.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 02:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

== Slight fix to jobs ==

I have fixed an issue with [[mediawikiwiki:Manual:Job queue|jobs]]. After the upgrade, we were not able to run jobs in the background, so we had to attach them to requests at random (i.e. each page load had some chance of having a job processed as part of handling the request). This caused somewhat of a slowdown and also meant that jobs didn't always run as quickly as would have been ideal. Now, jobs are run by a cron job that runs separately from any request. This should result in a slight performance improvement.

That's all. Other than that, nothing should change.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 02:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
:Haven't jobs been broken for a long time lol? {{User:VFDan/Sig}} 01:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
::One specific job was broken for a long time, and that was fixed with the upgrade. Other jobs were working as expected. However, the ''ability to run jobs at all'' was broken by the upgrade (or at least the ability to run them via a cron job, so we had to attach them to requests again). However, this has all been fixed.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 01:33, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

== Table of contents ==

Hey everyone. I've seen on some pages that they have a table of contents. How do I get that to appear?
Sorry for the short section. <scratchsig>8bitjake</scratchsig> 15:09, 22 October 2020 (UTC)8bitjake
:They will automatically generate if the page has enough content.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 15:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

== Give the right of deletion of messages on their own talk pages to users  ==

For example, here is a good example of it in Wikipedia: [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#User_talk_pages|here]]. I think that the system also may work fine on Scratch Wiki. Although this rules are against to deletion of talk pages, this might be good for users whose do not want to archive (though it's accessible from history). {{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 12:49, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
:I don't really think this is a good idea. For one, I wouldn't want to write up a message and then have a user just delete it because they feel like it. Also, the messages should be kept for reference purposes in the future. So I don't really like this idea.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 12:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
::But the messages are always accessible through history, because we're not allowing to the deletion of page.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 12:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
:::But it's far easier to go to a subpage than to dig through page history.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 15:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
::::No, you can just filter from date and user contribs. That shouldn't be hard.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 15:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::"shouldn't be hard" on a small talk page sure, but not on large ones. I hated  on wikipedia where I made a post on a talk page and someone else (not even the owner of the talk page!) removed saying it was incorrect. I added it back and then the actual owner of the talk page removed it. It was very blantant plagiarism (word for word copied). Stuff like this shouldn't happen. No support. {{User:VFDan/Sig}} 19:51, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::: When someone removes a message from their talk page, you may take that as an indication that they have read the message. Talk page owners ''should'' be allowed to remove messages from them. If your objection is simply to the message being removed and nothing else, that is not something that is problematic when either the message violates policy or it is being removed by the owner of the talk page. If the objection is that removing the message is an attempt at avoiding scruntiny, you are free to take any actions that you would otherwise if the message was not removed, such as reverting or raising complaints at [[/Admin Requests]]. Therefore, ''there is no reason to prevent removal of messages from the owner<nowiki>'</nowiki>s talk page''. While waiting until time has passed then archiving them may be preferred and is done on public venues such as this page, there is no need to ''require'' that. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 20:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

== Re-RFC for [[Scratch_Wiki_talk:Community_Portal/Not_Done#Relax_S:NOSP_even_more|S:NOSP]] ==

I think that we must edit restrictions about mods and user generated content. For example: we shouldn't create an another namespace for user-generated content, the users are already creating them on their subpages. And it must be possible to delete old and not notable mod pages.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 07:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
: Yes, I think that the date the page is created is irrelevant. Either the subject is notable, or it is not. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 02:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
== Updating all the blocks categorys footer to 3.0 mode ==

Hey folks !
This was the current pen extension footer :
{{Pen Blocks}}

What the 3.0 version will be :

<div style="height:10px"></div>
{{navbox
 | name    = Template:Pen Extension
 | title   = {{#ifeq: {{FULLPAGENAME}} | Pen Extension | Pen Extension | [[Pen Extension|<span style="color: #FFFFFF>This block was a </span><sb>Pen Extension Block::pen</sb>]]}}
 | tstyle  = background-color: #0FBD8C
 | state   = open
 | group1  = <div style="text-align:center;">[[Erase All (block)|Erase All]] {{*}} [[Stamp (block)|Stamp]] {{*}} [[Pen Down (block)|Pen Down]] {{*}} [[Pen Up (block)|Pen Up]] {{*}} [[Set Pen Color to () (color input block)|Set Pen Color to ()]] {{*}} [[Change Pen () by () (block)|Change Pen () by ()]] {{*}} [[Set Pen () to () (block)|Set Pen () to ()]] {{*}} [[Change Pen Size by () (block)|Change Pen Size by ()]] {{*}} [[Set Pen Size to () (block)|Set Pen Size to ()]]<span style="float:right;font-weight:bold;">[[Blocks#List of Blocks|More blocks...]]</span></div>}}

Please vote {{Done|Yes}} if you want this to be changed or {{Not done|No}} if you don't want below !
I will take decision the 1st of november.
<scratchsig>Scratcheur-2020Send</scratchsig>19:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
: I am not voting, but I think EW+ (users that are Experienced Wikians or above) should have the final decision of this. Although, if your second design is chosen, the other block categories might need to be updated to reflect that design {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 07:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
::Yes, i know about that... the pen footer was just a preview exemple {{e|:)}}<br /><small>''-unsigned comment by {{user|Scratcheur-2020Send}}''</small> 08:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
::: " EW+ (users that are Experienced Wikians or above) should have the final decision of this" No, wikis resolve around consensus and it is not the role of Experienced Wikians to ignore that. Unless this was in reference to the "I will take decision the 1st of november." comment by OP, in which case I agree OP should not close the discussion as they are involved as the proposer.
::: As for the content change in question, I think the old version is better both as there is no need to embed a block there and the "This block was a Pen Extension Block" sentence makes no sense in this context as it is the title for the navbox, not a part of the page body. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 02:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
::::Basically what Naleksuh said, I vote no; it's way overbloated and takes away from the article. No support {{User:VFDan/Sig}} 19:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::{{Not done|No support}} for the reasons Naleksuh and VFDan stated. I also think the current footer works fine, and if anything should be updated there, it would just be changing the color to match the 3.0 blocks.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 20:51, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

== Why is there Language Tutorials? ==
{{not done}}

So, there's [[Language Tutorials|this]], which has '''other''' programming language tutorials. This is kind of weird, especially in the '''''Scratch''''' Wiki. I know the "comparing other programming languages with Scratch" thing, but they [http://www.w3schools.com could just link to ''other'' programming language websites.]
{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 00:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
:The Language Tutorials here also compare the code to Scratch code, making it a better starting point for people trying to transition.
:<small><small>And I spent a solid amount of time on the C++ tutorials...</small></small>{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 14:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Edit: added not done. <small>Also, add more tutorials?</small>
{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 00:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
:The language tutorials was a project that we started a long time ago in order to increase the diversity of topics and more solidly provide people with suggestions for post-Scratch programming experiences. <scratchsig>Makethebrainhappy</scratchsig> 02:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
::Some interesting stats on the language program. Since its conception in August 2018 we've pulled in approx. 2600 organic viewers for the page. When you look at the [https://u.cubeupload.com/MakeTheBrainHappy/ScreenShot20201028at.png graph] there are a few days when editors are working on it which increases total count (blue) vs. organic count (orange). Overall I think the program has a lot of potential to pull in a stable organic user page as it continues to expand. <scratchsig>Makethebrainhappy</scratchsig> 02:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

== Thankful Thursday! October 29{{th}}, 2020 ==
{{Scratch Wiki:Thankful Thursday/archive 033}}

{{quote|There are many more people on this wiki who deserve these comments just as much as those who received them. :) Everyone is special and brings their own ideas. The more of us there are, the better the community spirit. Sadly, I must sign off now- <scratchsig>Makethebrainhappy</scratchsig> 01:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)}}


The next TT is, November 26{{th}}, see you then!
<scratchsig>Jakel181</scratchsig> 01:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
:{{done}}<scratchsig>Jakel181</scratchsig> 01:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

== Prevent categories from being added to userspace via AbuseFilter ==

It is possible for categories to be added to userspace pages, which are not supposed to have categories.

I think categories being added to userspace pages is quite common, and could be prevented by AbuseFilter.

The only exception should be [[:Category:Pages in Need of Deletion]]. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 16:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
: (Bumping this) The category marking open userpages should also be an exception. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 07:08, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
::The most common way categories are added to userpages is via templates, and unfortunately AbuseFilter does not actually parse the page/do transclusion drilldown. This would require maintaining a list of templates that have categories attached to them. This would ''also'' require an exception looking for the <code><nowiki>|cat=no</nowiki></code>, which would be a pain to implement properly.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 21:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

== Unused User Images Mass Deletion ==
{{done}}

Within the coming days, unused [[:Category:Users' Images|Users' Images]] and [[:Category:Users' Logos|Users' Logos]] will be tagged for deletion. After marking the images with {{t|Unused user image}}, they will be deleted around two weeks later. If you do not want your user image deleted, simply delete the template on the image you want to keep. I will update you all about my progress here. If you do not want any images to be deleted, please post a comment below! Thank you.{{User:KrIsMa/Sig2}}  03:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
:Unused images have been marked for deletion. Please review [[:Category:Unused Users' Images]] for the list of images. Please note the deletion date has been changed from ''two weeks later to one week later'', meaning they will be deleted on or after '''November 8, 2020'''. Please delete the template on the image if you want to keep the image. Thank you! {{User:KrIsMa/Sig2}}  18:20, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
::Completed. {{User:KrIsMa/Sig2}}  03:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

== Talk pages redirect ==

<!-- 
Please help me to put {{delete|This is a talk page redirect~~~~}} on all the talk redirections by searching 
"Talk: REDIRECT [[ "
--><br /><small>''-unsigned comment by {{user|Scratcheur-2020Send}}''</small> 18:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
:Why do they need to be deleted?{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 19:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
::They are unneeded <br /><small>''-unsigned comment by {{user|Scratcheur-2020Send}}''</small> 19:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
:::How?{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 20:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
::::As of right now, the bureaucrats and admins have said that it's not sure whether they should be deleted yet. The {{t|delete}} templates have been removed. Please reach a consensus first before adding mass deletion templates. However, thank you for wanting to contribute! {{e|:)}} <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 02:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

== Scratchblocks images ==

Hi, the Scratch Wiki is currently filled with 2.0 blocks screenshots.I think these pictures should be deleted because :
# They are outdated
# These pictures can be replaced with blocks
# They are pixelized

A bunch of pictures can be found [https://en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/Category:Scratch_2.0_Block_Images here]<br>
<scratchsig>Scratcheur-2020Send</scratchsig>19:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
:From what I've known, current scratchblocks images are kept for historical reasons, but new scratchblocks images uploaded recently should be deleted. <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 20:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

== Downtime? ==
{{done}}<br/>
At around 8:40 AM ET, the Scratch Wiki was down, only showing a 503. Was anyone else getting this issue, and why did the servers crash? {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 13:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
:This happens occasionally, unfortunately. This is an issue with our current server that happens when they are receiving more traffic than they can handle. We have taken measures to reduce how often this happens but haven't been able to completely eliminate it. As a longer-term solution, we are currently in the process of planning a server transfer, though that is probably still a ways off.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 15:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
::Ah, I see. I'll mark this {{done}} now.{{User:4096bits/Signature}} 15:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

== Should there be a template to mark custom signatures which do not follow signature guidelines? ==

Question is in the title. Although, templates only used on userspace pages might not be allowed and adding that template might violate userspace rules. Such template also needs to be hidden when the signature is transcluded or forces a user to use the default ScratchSig (unless that would also break userspace rules). {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 15:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
:Please don't edit others' userpages (including templates and signatures), even if they don't meet formatting guidelines (if it violates SCGs, then it's ok to remove it). First, ask the user on their talk page, and if that doesn't get results within a few days, contact an EW+.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 16:05, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
:: I now presume such template would be rejected per jvvg's comment, so I will consider this {{done}}. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 16:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
==My username starts with a lowercase letter==
{{Not done}}<br/>On the Scratch website you will notice my username (brooc210) starts with a lowercase letter but on the Scratch Wiki it starts with a uppercase letter. So is it ok to use <code><nowiki>{{DISPLAYTITLE:User:brooc210}}</nowiki></code> on my userpage? I also found out that if you template it, it ignores it because itʼs not part of the page (I found this out by templating the page [[Snap! (programming language)|Snap''!'' (programming language)]] on the [[S:S|sandbox]] without saving but using the preview). <scratchsig>brooc210</scratchsig> This is a signature!
:You can rename your userpage and your talk to the lowercase username <br /><small>''-unsigned comment by {{user|Scratcheur-2020Send}}''</small> 13:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
::@Scratcheur-2020Send: That is not possible, see what I wrote below. 
:: Due to MediaWiki restrictions, usernames must start with an uppercase letter. Displaytitle is the closest anyone can get to having a lowercase username. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 14:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
:::So do you think I should?<scratchsig>brooc210</scratchsig> This is a signature! 14:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
::::Yes, you can use displaytitle for that. We actually have [[Template:Lowercase title|a dedicated template specifically for this purpose]]. Unfortunately due to the way MediaWiki works, everything needs to start with a capital letter, including usernames. As "jvvg", I can commiserate with you.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 20:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

=="Watchlist" Details==
{{done}}<br/>So, I know that the watchlist allows for you to keep track of edits made to certain Wiki pages, but I also noticed that there is a button labeled "Live Updates" that shows up when you go [[Special:Watchlist|here]]. Does anyone know what that does? <scratchsig>84375</scratchsig> 02:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
:Oops, never mind, I just figured it out. Marking as {{done}}.<scratchsig>84375</scratchsig> 03:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

== Talk page (for pages not users) archives? ==
{{not done}}
Title.<br>
{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 00:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
:What specifically are you asking? Are you talking about if this exists or you are suggesting it? {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 19:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

== How do I bring attention to a specific talk page to discuss an article?  ==

{{done}}

And while I'm asking, is it proper etiquette to bring attention to one of them, or do you have to wait for someone to come across it naturally? <scratchsig>EZ-Games</scratchsig> 17:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
:I recommend using the [[S:DIS|discussion invitation system]] as you can just send a message to people on the list on their talk page (Just remember to respect their limits) Most of the time they will respond to the message and check out the talk page you linked.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 19:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
::Ah yes, this is what I was looking for. Thank you! I'll be marking this as {{done}} now. <scratchsig>EZ-Games</scratchsig> 02:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

== When someone edits your talk page, it says you have a new message from another user. ==

Well, sorry for another topic, but this is a bug so i'll bring it up.
Title says it all.<br>
{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 00:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
:That is intentional, so users know when they recieved a message and so the user who recieves the message can deal with the message quicker. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 07:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
::Yes, but if someone edits their message... -snip- <br>{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 20:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
:::It's kinda hard to make an exception for notifying people for editing their message.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 21:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
::::Hmm.. We should send the user a message only if they add something to the talk page!{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 14:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
:::::It's extremely difficult to automatically determine if an edit to your talk page was a new message or a modification to an existing one (this was an issue I came across writing WikiMonitor when detecting unsigned posts, and in the end my algorithm is still not 100% perfect). Therefore, MediaWiki (the platform this Wiki runs on) will notify you whenever your talk page is modified, since it is considered important that you know whenever someone modifies it.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 22:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
::::::Does MediaWiki send a notification whenever another user <u>'''m'''</u> minor edits a user talk page? If yes, then is there a way to make it so that it doesn't? <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 17:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
{{outdent}} Please answer that, jvvg! {{e|:)}} {{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 15:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

== Suggestions for highlighting active notifications in Echo ==

A few times, it has been suggested we add the [[mediawikiwiki:Extension:Echo|Echo extension]], which, in a nutshell, would allow users to be notified when mentioned on talk pages (and provide various other kinds of notifications as well. There has never been any major objection, but in the current version of MediaWiki and the extension, the styling causes significant issues with our current skin. I have been able to overcome those challenges, resulting in this:

[[File:Echo integrated with SWS user menu.png]]

However, one major thing remains. That is how do we emphasize individual menu items that have active notifications (for example, the "notices" link in this screenshot)? The only idea I was able to come up with myself is a badge similar to what displays next to the user menu at the top of that screenshot, but don't think that's a great idea since with the icons, those links already are pretty wide. Does anyone else have any suggestions?<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 22:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

== Undeletion of [[GameBender]] ==
Should be procedurally undeleted as the reason provided for deletion is flatly not true-- [[:users:ericr]] is involved in development and last time I checked they are a Scratch Team member. To the deleting sysop I will say that this is why discussion is important and not simply running around deleting whatever. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 02:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
:The deletion reason says:
:''unless a '''reliable source''' that says a *current* ST member is involved is included, this is akin to a Scratch Mod which we now disallow by policy. Additionally '''there isn't enough content to warrant a full article''', especially since it's not released yet.''
:Please, at least read the reason of the deletion, and give the link to the reliable source. {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 08:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
:: Apple502j, this page is labelled "Admin Requests" and involves the undeletion of a page. You are not an admin, nor may you undelete pages. The request to "at least read the reason of the deletion" when I already quoted and addressed it above does not help either.
:: I am not able to reference the content of the page, obviously as it has been deleted, however if my memory serves the page was well-sourced and clearly indicated the involvement. Even if it is not, sources being found are a part of the deletion discussion process, which again does not appear to have taken place at all. As such, the page should be restored and, ''at most'', tagged with <code><nowiki>{{NotUseful}}</nowiki></code> (although the page would likely be kept due to the concerns in the nom statement being falsified instantly). <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 06:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
::: (note: this section is moved to CP, per the CPSYS guidelines)
::: Even though I'm not able to undelete, I can delete the page - in fact, the deletion is suggested by me on the talk page first, and we didn't have any response for more than two weeks. Also, the discussion is now moved to the Community Portal (see the CPSYS rules), so nothing is preventing me from posting this, both as an EW and as a user.
::: Saying "I read the reason" implies that you will also act accordingly; the reason specifically asked reliable sources, and you didn't provide any, at least in your posts. The deletion is (mostly) because Ken did not think that the citations given are either not enough, or incredible; so you have to explain how the page was "well-sourced". (If you need the deleted page's source, I can ask admins to post it somewhere.)
::: Finally: I'm sure we do not restore pages if they need NotUseful template. {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 10:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
:::: Deleted article (for reference) [[User:Naleksuh/GameBender]] {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 10:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
{{outdent|::::}}
I deleted the article for a few reasons.

First off, nothing in it mentioned ericr's involvement, nor are there any sources that directly mention such. The GameBender website lists him as a "collaborator" which is not enough involvement for the purposes of NOSP - had he been listed as part of "Team GameBender" I would have maybe considered this a valid invocation of the rule, but a single name mention could have been one line of code.

Even if he had been part of the team, it's still not allowed. [[S:NEWPAGES|Notability requirements]] expressly forbid Scratch Mods, and as far as I can see, and as far as the article describes, this is very much a Scratch Mod - it modifies Scratch to add bells and whistles. The ST-member exception is very clear that the article must meet normal notability requirements - this does not meet them.

A couple final notes:
* CPSYS explicitly states that it's "for actions requiring admin/EW attention that need no discussion". Apple is an EW, and it turned out that it needed discussion. Ergo, the topic was moved here.
* The sum total of the sources was the GB website, on which I had to scroll all the way down to find the "Team" link in the footer, then scroll all the way past the "Team GameBender" section to find Eric Rosenbaum in the list of "Collaborators"; and three Vimeo links which had no people in them, just demonstrations of GB itself. There was no ''clear'' indication of his involvement.
* Please don't say "you are not an admin" in an effort to shut someone up. Anyone that is technically able to reply has a say, even if they can't actually execute some of the actions required.

I appreciate your effort to bring content to the Wiki, but please consider the notability and suitability of the future articles you create. The article stays deleted.{{User:Kenny2scratch/sig}} 11:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
:: Apple502j, my purpose in suggesting the addition of the NotUseful template was that no discussion surrounding deletion had taken place at all. It does not make sense for pages to be deleted without discussion but then require discussion for them to be undeleted. The purpose of restoring the page with the NotUseful template would be to fostor discussion (it would also require the nominator to actually show problems instead of simply deleting in violation of policy). In addition, I was by no means suggesting that the article qualified for the NotUseful template-- I specifically indicated that it would likely be kept as well.
:: Kenny2scratch, it should be abundantly clear that the page in question was not a "Scratch modification" in the slightest (Scratch modifications are software, the page in question was about a piece of ''hardware''). It does not seem to fit into any of the categories and is generally thought to be allowed as a semi-official product (around as notable as, say, [[LEGO WeDo]]). Regardless, claims such as "the article stays deleted" are generally made by ''uninvolved'' administrators, and you are by no means uninvolved.
:: It should (hopefully) be clear to any uninvolved administrator that the page did not meet the criteria for speedy deletion in any way, and even if the normal deletion venue was used, the nominator made no attempt to [[S:BEFORE]], as well as the fact that the page in question is not about a third-party Scratch modification but a piece of hardware officially affiliated with Scratch which is well-documented in other venues. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 20:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
::: I suggested the deletion on the talk page in October; nobody (including Naleksuh yourself) responded it, though, so it was safe to assume that nobody was against that idea. Additionally, English Scratch Wiki rules, AFAIK, do not require discussion before (un)deleting something. Admins can undelete without discussion; but that does not mean admins have to undelete wihout discussion. They can decide.
::: GameBender is both a hardware and a software (because you can't just play Scratch with a CPU and RAM). LEGO WeDo (and other stuff like micro:bit) are used in the official Scratch extensions and available at scratch.mit.edu, while anyone can claim to be one of the Scratch Team members and put their names on their website. One example of this was "Dexter Industries GoPiGo For Raspberry Pi", which was deleted because it was not notable.
::: Any administrators can take action.
::: And finally: [[S:NOTWP]]. We do not have speedy delete and normal delete, and S:BEFORE is deadlink. (jawiki is the only wiki, AFAIK, that has both). A question: is there any website that mentions ST members are involved "as ST member" (i.e. not as a hobby). '''on scratch.mit.edu or other websites that are not GameBender official website'''? {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 03:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
:::: I will say that "We do not have speedy delete and normal delete"  is not true, that is exactly what we have ("speedy delete" being [[Template:Delete]] and "normal delete" being [[Template:NotUseful). However, I concede with the fact that the page in question actually ''was'' nominated for deletion. I was not aware of this until it was actually deleted. This may be an issue with the deletion process that can be resolved elsewhere. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 04:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

== Promoting apple502j ==

Hi everyone,

I'm suggesting promoting apple502j to adminship.

{{user|apple502j}} has been an excellent and active user both in jawiki and enwiki, and I'm sure that anyone in the wiki can agree that by looking contributions both in wikis and code contributions on the wiki extensions. However, sometimes it seems he has lack on accessing to tools - protection, undeletion, and on handling stuffs around the wiki. (we've recently see that on restoring deleted pages)

With in this mind, I'm suggesting that promoting apple502j to adminship with the agreement of admins and wiki community. '''You can vote it by''' {{done|yes}} '''and''' {{not done|no}} ''for whether you're supporting or not supporting promotion of apple502j to adminship.''

I will start: I vote {{done|yes}}.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 11:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
:I disagree. Apple is not experienced enough on enwiki (for comparison, Bigpuppy was promoted 30 months after he became EW; Apple has been EW for 14 months), and he already has full access to jawiki which I think keeps his hands full - adding enwiki adminship would only add to his burden. Unless other admins think otherwise, I consider this {{not done|Rejected}}.{{User:Kenny2scratch/sig}} 11:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
::{{done|Support!}} ''even though it's not election time''<br>{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 15:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
:::{{not done|Strong oppose}} While I assume this request was filed due to [[Special:Diff/266623|my recent comment]] that Apple502j is not an admin, this was mentioned both in attempt against "non-admin closures", but more importantly the comment was erroneous. As for whether or not Apple502j should become an admin, [[Special:Diff/263569|this comment]] is enough to warrant a strong oppose on its own. <code>Naleksuh mentioned that current system is like a hierarchy - and that is true. However, this is supposed to happen.</code> is the complete opposite spirit that would be expected from anyone who wants to request adminship. This has happened on several other occasions as well such as [[Special:Diff/263805]] where the candidate proclaimed that a "rule is now clear" because one sysop wrote a comment proclaiming something. While this is the strongest point from anyone who wants to request adminship, even if all of that was to be ignored, it is questionable whether they are even here to contribute to the enecylopedia at all. Out of the candidate's [[Special:Contributions/Apple502j|50 most recent edits]], only two of them were to mainspace. Yes, '''two'''. Overall, I see no evidence of directing improvement towards the wiki and much more towards trying to act authoritatively, which is the polar opposite of anyone who should be trying to request adminship. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 20:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
::::I am explicitly neutral on the specific idea of promoting apple502j. That being said, (specifically to Naleksuh), the hostile tone of your recent messages, including this one, is not acceptable.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 23:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
::::: Kinda busy right now, please reject this. {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 07:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

== Prevent links to Scratch profiles in mainspace ==

Linking to Scratch profiles in mainspace is against Wiki Guidelines, and I think it is a bit common. If this is accepted, AbuseFilter could be used. Both non-interwiki and Interwiki links to profiles should be detected. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 15:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
:What's AbuseFilter?<br>{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 23:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
::[[mediawikiwiki:Extension:AbuseFilter|AbuseFilter]] is an extension we use to automatically enforce various policies. Currently, it's used for filtering inappropriate language, preventing New Wikians from editing others' userpages without permission, blocking uploading large files (images above a certain size can cause problems on the server), blocking uploading files without a category, and preventing moves/deletions without a summary (see [[Special:AbuseFilter]] for more). As for the original suggestion, is this a common problem that comes up? I wouldn't be willing to add this unless it is, and it is also possible that there might be a legitimate reason (just thinking out loud here, linking to a ST member's profile as an example profile page) and then that would add technical and administrative overhead.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 23:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Oh.
{{User:Lovecodeabc/Signature}} 15:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

== [[Featured Studios/Currently Featured‎]] ==

There should be a program that checks a few times a day if a studio has been featured, and if so, updates [[Featured Studios/Currently Featured]] so it will always match what is on the Scratch front page.<scratchsig>Mlcreater</scratchsig> 19:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

== What would happen if... ==

What would happen if I edited [https://en.scratch-wiki.info/w/index.php?title=File:Test.png&action=edit this] page? You're supposed to upload a file, but I'm curious what would happen if you edited a new file page without uploading a file. {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 16:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
: Is the link invalid? It's telling me the page has been deleted and I would need to re-create it first. <scratchsig>J_Coder26</scratchsig> 23:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
::That is intentional for this "what if" situation. {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 23:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
::: Oh, ok I get what you were saying now. But I'm not sure, sorry. <scratchsig>J_Coder26</scratchsig> 01:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
::::That's OK {{E|:)}} {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 02:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

== My signature ==
{{done}}<br>
Hi, I have question. My signature's timestamp is not formatting correctly. ([https://ibb.co/pjW6y3y image]) Does anyone know why this may be? You can view the code for my sig at [[User:Leahcimto/Signature]]. Thanks!{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}}

:I tested removing the <nowiki><br/></nowiki>, that may work. I didn't save any changes since editing userspace is against the rules, though, so you'll have to do it yourself. {{User:78ch3/Sig}} 09:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
::When I remove it, my signature goes on the same line as my text :/{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 13:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
:::Does anyone else know how I can fix it?{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 16:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
::::Nevermind, there was an extra space in my minisig.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 15:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

== "ScratchWikiSkin" Source Code - How do I get it? ==

<big>Hello everyone!</big>
<br>
This is a short message, but I feel like I should ask.
<br>
'''How do I get the source code of the "ScratchWikiSkin" in the [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering|Preferences]] menu? And, if possible, what is the source code? <big><big><big>🤔</big></big></big>'''
<br>
I was wondering about this because I want the skin for Wikipedia, however skins not included with Wikipedia have to be implemented using CSS or Javascript. If you can find the code, THANK YOU!
<br>
Thanks again,
<br>
<scratchsig>8bitjake</scratchsig> 16:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
:Here is [https://github.com/InternationalScratchWiki/ScratchWikiSkin2 ScratchWikiSkin2], found on the [https://github.com/InternationalScratchWiki Scratch Wiki github].{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 17:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

== Please delete these pages. ==

Hey, Scratch Wiki!
This topic will be different from normal.
Earlier today, I made some pages I want to delete now. However, I am not an admin, and I don't want to flag them as '''candidates''' for deletion.
Please let an admin know about this.
Here are all pages I want deleted.
<br>[[Scratch_Wiki:April_Fools/Scratch_Wiki:April_Fools/User:8bitjake]]
<br>[[Scratch_Wiki:April_Fools/Scratch_Wiki:April_Fools/Scratch_Wiki:April_Fools/User:8bitjake]]
<br>[[User:8bitjake/Templates/Sidebar]]
<br>
Yep, that's all of them.
I will make a new topic when I want new pages deleted.
<br>
{{User:8bitjake/Templates/Siggy}}
: I'm not an admin, but maybe you should ask a specific person so that you can get a response faster =) <scratchsig>J_Coder26</scratchsig> 23:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
::To let an EW+ know you want those pages deleted, put <code><nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki></code> at the top of the page.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 00:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
:::{{done}} - in the future, we also have [[Scratch Wiki talk:Community Portal/Admin Requests]] for stuff like this.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 01:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

== How can I make my whole talk page a certain font? ==

{{done}}<br>
Title. I have tried using the span style tags, but that only does one line at a time. Is there someting else I can use to do the whole page?{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 00:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
:If you put <nowiki><div style="font-face:my font"></nowiki> at the very top (and do ''not'' close it), that will apply a font to your whole page. If you do this, please make sure not to use a font/style that is too difficult to read.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 01:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
::Thank you! I'll mark this as {{done}} now.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 13:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

== 2nd Sandbox == 
So, I happened to notice that bigpuppy had made a 2nd sandbox [[User:Bigpuppy/Sandbox_2|here]] and I wanted to make a 2nd sandbox myself for experimental purposes. Do I just do that by creating a new page called "User:J_Coder26/Sandbox2" which I did [[User:J_Coder26/Sandbox2|here]]? I'm not sure if there's a specific way to do this or I'm just supposed to create a new page, so if anyone could let me know that would be helpful. Thanks. <scratchsig>J_Coder26</scratchsig> 08:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
:You're right, you can name it whatever you want - for example, "Sandbox2" or "Another sandbox". {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 15:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
::Alright, thank you. <scratchsig>J_Coder26</scratchsig> 16:42, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

== Signature template - Is it possible? ==

<big>'''HELLO WORLD!'''</big>
I was wondering if it is possible to set your signature - the 3 tildas - to be a template.
In other words, your signature ''calls'' a template. In this case, ''<nowiki>{{User:8bitjake/Templates/Siggy}}</nowiki>''
<br>
Here are both my signatures, with the latter being my current one (the default), and the former being my wanted signature.
<br>
{{User:8bitjake/Templates/Siggy}}
<br>
<scratchsig>8bitjake</scratchsig>
<br>
If you can find a way to make a signature a template - THANK YOU!
Thanks again,
<scratchsig>8bitjake</scratchsig> 20:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
<br>
<br>
[[File:CitationComPortal.PNG]]
:See [[S:SIG]] {{User:VFDan/Sig}} 03:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

== Wiki Question ==

What's happened in the last few months on the wiki? I've been a bit swamped with schoolwork so I'm just asking since my last real activity was around late September. <br />{{User:Garnetluvcookie/Sig}} 14:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
:The CP's been archived<small>(I think)</small>, [[User:Jackson49|Jackson49]] joined, (he is so helpful), [[Project]]'s intro picture changed,
yeah, that's baciclly all that happened.
[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 14:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

== 2020 Election? ==

Hi! So, I'm new to the Scratch Wiki, so I'm not well informed about this yet, so sorry if this is obvious or irrelevant, but is there going to be a 2020 election for new Administrators or Experienced Wikians? From what I can find, it looks like there is an election once per year, yet I can't find any info for a 2020 election, despite 2020 being almost over. Is there going to be one soon? <scratchsig>Jackson49</scratchsig> 02:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
:{{done|rejected}} Well, we're tired of elections (especially after a big, real one) - maybe next year (though not sure). We had a new administrator this year so that's enough. {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 03:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
::Okay, thanks for your info! By the way, I wasn't suggesting an election. I was just asking if there was going to be one, but I got enough info from your answer, so thanks. <scratchsig>Jackson49</scratchsig> 14:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
:::To be a bit more specific, we have elections on an as-needed basis rather than following any sort of fixed schedule. We currently have sufficient EW+, but will hold an election if the situation changes to the point where we determine we need more. Also, as apple502j said, elections are time consuming and a distraction from regular Wiki operations, so we try not to have them ''too'' often.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 17:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

== WikiMonitor ==
{{done}}
Hi, WikiMonitor has been giving me a lot of "unsigned" messages, but the linked edits are me marking something as done on my talk page. Does anyone know how I can get WikiMonitor to ignore the edits of me marking topics as done, preferably without the {{t|NoBots}} template?{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 22:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
:Check the 'this is a minor edit' box when you add the Done template. Also, I think WikiMonitor ignores NoBots. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 07:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
::Thanks! {{done}}{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 21:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
:::Yes, marking an edit as minor will cause it to be ignored. I did my best to determine what counts as a message vs. not a message, but that's a nearly impossible task to get universally right with a basic algorithm. Please do not add {{t|NoBots}} just to avoid getting notifications if you are getting a lot of notifications for actual mistakes you made (if any) though, as I have the ability to override that if I determine someone is abusing the template.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 21:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

== Why did you move servers? ==

You moved from the US to Germany, right? Why did you move servers?<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 15:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
:I'll give the very short version: the Wiki was for a long time directly run by the ST. They were in charge of technical maintenance, were (for all intents and purposes) the only users with bureaucrat privileges (think stuff like modifying system settings, modifying user permissions, blocking, etc.), and paid for the hosting. However, the ST didn't have much direct involvement with the community, so often such changes that needed to be made required contacting a ST member, which could take a while to get a response. At the same time, the Wiki EW+ faced a lot of obstacles in getting things done for these reasons, since we couldn't actually make any changes directly and instead had to go via the ST. Furthermore, the ST did not want to continue being responsible for both funding and maintaining the Wiki. While all of this was happening, the Scratch Wikis in other languages (the flagship one being German) existed independently and were not maintained by the ST. Eventually, an arrangement to give the Wiki community direct control and relieve the ST of the responsibility of maintaining was reached, and that was that the Wiki would be moved to be hosted alongside the other non-English Wikis, and that's where we are now.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 21:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
::Yeah, but the fair use problem and stuff...<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 01:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
:::Unfortunately there is also the funding angle of this. The hosting was already funded (and still is) for a host in Germany, but to run it in the United States, we would have to fund it ourselves. We are considering moving the server back to the United States and working out a funding arrangement, but so far don't have an official plan.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 02:45, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

== What should be done about a bad reference? ==

{{done}}
What if an article has a reference that does not prove the fact it is placed after?
<scratchsig>Mlcreater</scratchsig> 01:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
:In that case, remove the reference and add {{t|citation needed}}.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 02:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
::{{done}}<scratchsig>Mlcreater</scratchsig> 04:07, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

== Question ==

You don't have the visual editor on talk pages. '''''Why, oh, why?'''''<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 00:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
:The short answer is that it doesn't work well with talk pages (yet). Once MediaWiki can make it work better with talk pages, we can enable it there.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 18:44, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
::{{done}}<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 21:52, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

== 12{{th}} anniversary of Scratch Wiki! ==

Yay! {{e|tenmil}} {{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 17:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
:{{e|tenmil}} <scratchsig>Jackson49</scratchsig> 20:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
::Whoo-hoo! Happy 12{{th}} anniversary Scratch Wiki! {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 20:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
:Yay, happy 12{{th}} birthday! {{e|tenmil}}<br><small>someone bake a birthday cake, the name of the person is "Scratch Wiki", it's his 12th birthday</small><br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 21:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
:::Yay! Happy 12{{th}} anniversary Scratch Wiki! Look, I even made some cupcakes: {{e|cupcake}}  {{e|cupcake}} {{e|cupcake}} {{e|cupcake}} {{e|cupcake}} {{e|cupcake}}<small><br/>
:::hope thats enough for all gobo's friends</small>{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 22:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
::::{{e|10mil}} {{e|10mil}} {{e|10mil}} <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 22:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::I made a cake! 🎂 {{e|cupcake}} Scratch Cat {{e|cupcake}} Gobo {{e|cupcake}} Pico{{e|cupcake}} Nano{{e|cupcake}} Giga {{e|cupcake}}<br>ENOUGH<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 13:59, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

== Upgrade MediaWiki ==

Title. [[Special:Version]] (1.3.5) vs [https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Version this] (1.3.6)<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 22:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
:MediaWiki version 1.3.6 is not available to the public yet as I can see. {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 23:09, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
::Also, upgrading MediaWiki is a fairly major undertaking. It takes 30-90 minutes ''per wiki'' during which the Wiki being upgraded must be down completely and there are a total of nine Wikis. Additionally, we generally have to do a lot of prep work, like doing a dry run to make sure none of our custom software breaks and see if we need to do any configuration updates. As a result, we generally only install major updates (LTS versions) unless there is a critical feature/bug fix. Anyway, the current stable version available to the public is still 1.35, with 1.36 not released yet.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 00:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
::: Jvvg, the last time MediaWiki had been updated here being how it was was due to an exceptional circumstance involving previous changes and updating from an unsupported version. In general, standard updates are merely a routine task and are not a major project, nor do they require downtime (WMF wikis update seemlessly weekly).
::: Lovecodeabc, MediaWiki.org runs WMF builds of MediaWiki, which are modified distributed on a weekly basis and are not intended for public use such as Scratch Wiki. The latest stable version is still 1.35.0, which is what Scratch Wiki is currently using. The current supported versions can be tracked at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Version_lifecycle. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 08:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
:::: We are using LTS versions, so the problem with 1.28 should not exist for at least 2.5 years now. We also use several extensions that are created by us, and we have to test that it works, before using them.
:::: Most of WMF weekly updates do not involve huge database changes - the "downtime" is mostly for changes that require DB lock. It may also be a way to reduce bandwidth while files are being transported, but I'm not sure.
:::: If it's a patch update, sure, it should be easy - but "major" upgrade is not. But at least we have 2.5 years. {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 13:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

== Is Visual Editor enabled by default? ==
{{done}}<br>
For new users to be more specific. {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 22:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
:No. I had to go to [[Special:Preferences]] and enable the visual editor.<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 14:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
::Does the edit option appear as "Edit" or "Edit source" before you enabled VE? {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 17:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
:::It is "Edit": I do not have Visual enabled<scratchsig>Mlcreater</scratchsig> 17:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
::::IIRC it was enabled for me following the update.{{User:Dominic305/Templates/Signature}} 14:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::Alrighty, thanks for the help! {{done}} {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 17:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

== Archive the CP ==

^^^^<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 14:06, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
:Not very big, we can kee it for now. {{done}} {{User:Apple502j/siggy}} 18:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

== Suggestion ==

{{not done}}<br>Yeah, so when you get a notification because a page on your watchlist changed, look closely, and you'll see it:<br><br>
Sent from account-requests@scratch-wiki.info<br><br>Weird, huh? We should change it!<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 23:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
:I never noticed that. I'll look into it.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 01:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
::I think it's been updated. Please let me know if there are any further issues.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 16:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
:::I don't think it's fixed yet- I just got a watchlist notification 19 hours ago and it still is from account-requests@scratch-wiki.info <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 18:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
{{outdent|3}}
Hmm. The relevant lines in LocalSettings.php are:
 $wgEmergencyContact = "contact@scratch-wiki.com";
 $wgPasswordSender = "account-requests@scratch-wiki.info";
 $wgNoReplyAddress = 'no-reply@scratch-wiki.info';
If anyone knows anything else to change, please let me know.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 18:48, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
:Might be that you didn't ''create'' those email adressses.<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 12:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
::No, that wouldn't affect it.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 17:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
:: $wgPasswordSender is the address used to send all site emails. It was originally for password resets but has somewhat evolved as MediaWiki begins sending more and more types of emails. You can simply change that to a different value if a different one is desired. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 19:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
:::Now, when I get an email it is from account-requests but the reply-to email is no-reply@scratch-wiki.info.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 22:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

==Nobots template not working ==
So, the nobots template is showing as a red link, or dissapers. Can you help? <scratchsig>HacksonJackson</scratchsig> 23:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
:I might be wrong, but I think it's because it starts with a lowercase n. It should be NoBots <scratchsig>Jackson49</scratchsig> 23:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
::The fact that nothing changes is intentional. Bots are designed to check if the template is there, and if you look at the template code, there's mostly nothing in it. The template is blank. If you get a red link, make sure you spelt NoBots correctly. {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 23:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
:::It is meant to be put at the top of the page with no additional text, as it appears invisable because the template has no content. Make sure you spelled it right too. The correct spelling is <code>{{t|NoBots}}</code>.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 19:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

== Red Links ==

{{done}}<br>
I have a question about red links (also know as dead links). Should red links be removed? I have seen that they should simply be turned blue, but I have also seen (at [[S:CONTRIB]]) that it is listed as a flaw and should be removed. What is the correct answer?{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 18:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
:: If it is about a title that could reasonably exist, then it should be "turned blue" as said above rather than simply removed (for example, "A '''Scratcher''' is someone who has created at least one [[project|<span style="color:red">project</span>]]" would be better turned into "[[project]]" than "project". However, [[completely unreasonable article titles, such as this one,]] would likely be handled on a case by case basis. <scratchsig>Naleksuh</scratchsig> 19:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

== Short period of read-only time tonight ==

Hi everyone,

At [https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Scratch+Wiki+update+from+1.35.0+to+1.35.1&iso=20201224T21&p1=797 9pm Scratch Time tonight] (click the link to see it in your local timezone), we will be upgrading the English Wiki (i.e. this one) to MediaWiki 1.35.1. Unlike the last upgrade, this should be a pretty quick process that only takes a few minutes. The Wiki will be read-only during the time it takes since we do need to perform some database operations as part of the upgrade. I will post an update once that's done.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 22:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
:Right, I live in EST, and stay up until like 11pm (o_o lol) so I will witness it. Anyway, thanks for the heads up!<br>[[File:Lovecodeabc.png|20px|<span title=""></span>]][[User:Lovecodeabc| Lovecodeabc]] Links: [[User_talk:Lovecodeabc|talk page]] | [[users:lovecodeabc| scratch profile]] | [[Special:Contributions/Lovecodeabc|contributions]] 00:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
::We did encounter some small technical difficulties, but in the end it looks like we got everything working. Thank you for your patience! Please let me know if there are any issues.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 02:19, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

== A suggestion for the Style Guide ==

Frequently, users link to April Fools articles from others with the prefix for them before it. This is unnecessary, as the joke article will still show up on April Fools Day without it, and the original article likely does not show if the user goes to the joke page with the April Fools prefix.

I think something recommending that users should link April Fools pages from others using the link to the normal page should be added to the Style Guide.

For example, <nowiki>[[Scratch Wiki:April Fools/X]]</nowiki> (with X being the name of the article with an April Fools page) should be changed to <nowiki>[[X]]</nowiki>. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 18:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
:I don't think this should be in the overall style guide, but I'll add it April Fools' main page, which serves as a de facto style guide for April Fools' pages.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 19:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

== February Featured Images ==
Hello everyone! It's time to decide on [[Scratch Wiki Home/Featured Images|featured images]] for February. If you have any suggestions, please leave them below.

;What can I suggest?
You can suggest any image(s) on the English Scratch Wiki that have not been featured previously.
;How do I tell if an image has already been featured?
It will have the {{t|featured}} template on it, shown as a star icon in the top right corner of the image page.
;Is there a limit to the number of images I can suggest?
No. However, please don't suggest ''too many...'' {{e|:P}}<br/>{{User:Bigpuppy/Real Signature}} 18:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
:I suggest this image: [[File:Graphical Effects.png]] <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 22:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
::I suggest this one: [[File:Small Stage Layout Toggle Switch.png|300px]]{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 23:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
:::Looks like i'll suggest this one[[File:Scratch3 vector editor.jpg|300px]]<scratchsig>Geometric_ghast</scratchsig> 01:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
::::<small><small>hold up one of the images I suggested got featured</small></small> I'm suggesting [[:File:CosmiCat.png|this]] and [[:File:Leave A Comment Box.png|this]]. :P {{User:4096bits/Signature}} 01:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::This one, [[File:Gobo Normal Mainsite Frontpage.PNG|175px]]<br>{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 02:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
::::::[[File:Featured Galleries.png]] looks nice<scratchsig>Mlcreater</scratchsig> 03:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

== Thankful Thursday! December 31{{th}}, 2020 ==
Hello all, It's been a doozy of a year for all of us. I hope everyone is staying during these times. As we approach the new year let us try to be a better person, be kinder to each other, and let us remember to Scratch On!
<br />
<br />
{{Scratch Wiki:Thankful Thursday/archive 034}}

{{quote|There are many more people on this wiki who deserve these comments just as much as those who received them. :) Everyone is special and brings their own ideas. The more of us there are, the better the community spirit. Sadly, I must sign off now- <scratchsig>Makethebrainhappy</scratchsig> 01:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)}}


The next TT is, January 28{th}}, 2021 see you then!
<scratchsig>Jakel181</scratchsig> 14:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
:{{not done}}<scratchsig>Jakel181</scratchsig> 14:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

== Any way to see the newest wikians? ==
{{done}}
So, I recently made a welcoming message, and I'm having trouble finding new users to use it on. Is there a way to see the newest wikians anywhere?<br>{{User:Geometric_ghast/Signature}} 22:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
:Yes! The [[Special:Log/newusers|User Creation Log]] comes in handy for welcoming new users. You can also stalk [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] (like many other users do). <scratchsig>TenType</scratchsig> 22:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
::Ah, thanks!<br>{{User:Geometric_ghast/Signature}} 02:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

== We have almost 280,000 edits! ==

Live count: {{NUMBEROFEDITS}} {{e|10mil}}<br>{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 20:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

== Would an article about uploads.scratch.mit.edu be ok? ==

So, uploads.scratch.mit.edu is a pretty cool website, as it stores PFP's, project and studio thumbnails, and other images on the website. However, it can also serve as an alternate server for Scratch which has full interactivity with the main Scratch website (try uploads.scratch.mit.edu/discuss) (meaning that you can use it to access scratch if the main Scratch is down!)

So, would an article about this be needed/cool to have?<br>{{User:Geometric_ghast/Signature}} 22:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
:I think that would be an intresting article, and would be ok to create.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 01:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
::Yeah, that sounds like a good idea <scratchsig>Jackson49</scratchsig> 15:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
::Maybe it could go in an article about subdomains of Scratch? {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 15:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
:::uploads can do a lot more than the other subdomains, and is also a bit more notable, so i think it should have its own article<br>{{User:Geometric_ghast/Signature}} 22:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
::::I think it should have its own article too<scratchsig>Mlcreater</scratchsig> 23:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
:::::I think it should have its own article because it serves as an alternate server of scratch and stores all the images.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 23:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

== Disclaimers Page ==

{{not done}}<br>
In the English Scratch Wiki's footer, there is a disclaimers link at the bottom of the page under the legal category. It goes to [https://de.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/Project:Impressum this] page in German. Is this intentional, and is there a english version of the page that should be put there instead?{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 01:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
: It is in German, not Dutch, and the document is German because the Wiki's servers are in Germany. Also, there cannot be an English version because it is legally dangerous to translate legal documents. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 08:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
::If there is an English translation, the Wiki could be legally protected by a clause similar to §14 of the Scratch [[Terms of Use]], like this:{{faq|cat=no|If the Scratch Wiki provides you with a translation of the German language version of these Disclaimers, or any other policy, then you agree that the translation is provided for informational purposes only and does not modify the German language version. In the event of a conflict between a translation and the German version, the German version will govern.}}<scratchsig>Mlcreater</scratchsig> 13:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
:::Yes, that about summarizes the situation. The original text in German is legally binding, while text in English would be informational only irrespective of any translation errors/miscommunications. While we can provide a page in English with a disclaimer that the German is the authoritative version, that would require we have someone translate it, and so far nobody has invested the necessary time.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 15:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
::::{{quote|google translate|somebody}}<br>{{User:Lovecodeabc/Sig}} 15:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
:::::Google Translate is more inaccurate than manual translation. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 16:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

== Why is there no page about text engine? ==

Why is there no page about the text engine? I am still new to scratch wiki. I don't know what do we focus on here yet.

 <scratchsig>Jenniferandjim</scratchsig> 01:58, 9 January 2021 (UTC)jenniferandjim
:Welcome to the Scratch Wiki! There is an article about text engines [[Text_Rendering|here]]. <scratchsig>Jackson49</scratchsig> 19:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

== A template marking Raspberry Pi features are only available on the Raspberry Pi ==

I think a template described in the header could be made and be placed on pages. Here is a mockup:

{{Header Template|[[File:WMCommonsRaspberryPi4.jpg|100px]]|This feature is only available on the [[Raspberry Pi]] version of Scratch 3.0 offline. No other version has it.}}

Although it might fall under fair use, the image in my mockup could be replaced with the Raspberry Pi logo.

The template can make it clearer that the main version of Scratch does not contain such feature, and could prevent confusion that it does not exist outside the Raspberry Pi. {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 08:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
:The image is licensed under Creative Commons, granting us license to use it provided we attribute the original source (fair use is not relevant here). As for whether or not to use the template, I'm personally fine with it but let's see what some other people think too.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 16:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
::{{done|Support}}, I think it's fine and important since the code for Raspberry Pi's Scratch is closed source as far as I know.{{User:Ahmetlii/sig}} 20:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

== What would happen if a username on this wiki was found out to be a full name (or breaks the Community Guidelines in general)? ==

Question is in the title. Would all evidence of the username be deleted (renaming users is not possible yet as far as I know)? {{User:Jammum/Signature}} 16:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
: Hi Jammum. Well, to start, I would just like to say I'm not completely sure, but I assume if their name broke the community guidelines the account would get banned/deleted if there was no way to change it. Also, if it was their real name, the consequences would probably be different than if it was a name that broke the community guidelines in other ways. However, once again, I'm not certain. <scratchsig>J_Coder26</scratchsig> 21:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
::I would assume so, as I believe the Scratch Wiki enforces the same policies of personal information in usernames as Scratch does.<br>{{User:Geometric_ghast/Signature}} 01:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
:::I'm guessing that the acount would be blocked, and on all their edits the username would be hidden.{{User:Leahcimto/Signature}} 12:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
::::Remember that we have a closed account system, so it's very unlikely such a username would be allowed in the first place, as we would not accept any account requests from them. Also, they would need to have a Scratch account that is over two months old, which would also mean slipping by the Scratch Team for two months. It is ''possible'' to rename users, though as a matter of policy we don't do that since it may have unintended consequences, but if all of the above fail and we find a user with an inappropriate username, we would rename them (probably to a random string of characters) and block them.<scratchsig>jvvg</scratchsig> 19:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
:::::It might also be worthwhile to note that users ''can'' actually contact the ST and ask them to change their name if they have a good reason for it. For instance, they ''might'' not know their username broke the community guidelines or accidentally used their real name and they could contact the ST to change their name instead of getting their account banned. <scratchsig>J_Coder26</scratchsig> 18:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)