m (<br />)
(Merge this with the Stamps Block page: new section)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
After looking at his again I think that it is fine for this to have it's own article. {{User:Bsteward/sig}}22:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 
After looking at his again I think that it is fine for this to have it's own article. {{User:Bsteward/sig}}22:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 
<br />Keep it. It's cool. <scratchsig>Mathfreak231</scratchsig> 21:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 
<br />Keep it. It's cool. <scratchsig>Mathfreak231</scratchsig> 21:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Merge this with the Stamps Block page ==
 +
 +
I've seen this suggested here already, but it has been a couple of years.  Do you think that I should add a merge suggestion to the page?

Revision as of 04:53, 14 August 2015

Is this article important

Should it just be in the Stamp (block) article?
Scimonster (talk | contribs) 17:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I really can't decide, sorry ^^ (Sorry for the useless post - I didn't want you to think that no one read your message here :P)
Jonathanpb (talk | contribs) 00:20, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I think it's fine.
Veggieman001 (talk | contribs) 06:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Me too.
BWOG (talk | contribs) 00:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Anyone else?
BWOG (talk | contribs) 18:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I agree with scimonster, it's not really needed with its own article.
ElectricSparx (talk | contribs) 04:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

I think the information in this article should be copied to the Stamp (block) article and then this should redirect.
Bsteward (talk | contribs) 15:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC) After looking at his again I think that it is fine for this to have it's own article.
Bsteward (talk | contribs)22:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Keep it. It's cool.
Mathfreak231 (talk | contribs) 21:58, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Merge this with the Stamps Block page

I've seen this suggested here already, but it has been a couple of years. Do you think that I should add a merge suggestion to the page?